Mussack Veronika, Wittmann Georg, Pfaffl Michael W
Animal Physiology and Immunology, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephaner Berg 3, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Department for Transfusion Medicine, Cell therapeutics and Haemostaseology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Biomol Detect Quantif. 2019 Jun 4;17:100089. doi: 10.1016/j.bdq.2019.100089. eCollection 2019 Mar.
Small extracellular vesicles (EVs) are 50-200 nm sized mediators in intercellular communication that reflect both physiological and pathophysiological changes of their parental cells. Thus, EVs hold great potential for biomarker detection. However, reliable purification methods for the downstream screening of the microRNA (miRNA) cargo carried within urinary EVs by small RNA sequencing have yet to be established. To address this knowledge gap, RNA extracted from human urinary EVs obtained by five different urinary EV purification methods (spin column chromatography, immunoaffinity, membrane affinity, precipitation and ultracentrifugation combined with density gradient) was analyzed by small RNA sequencing. Urinary EVs were further characterized by nanoparticle tracking analysis, Western blot analysis and transmission electron microscopy. Comprehensive EV characterization established significant method-dependent differences in size and concentration as well as variances in protein composition of isolated vesicles. Even though all purification methods captured enough total RNA to allow small RNA sequencing, method-dependent differences were also observed with respect to library sizes, mapping distributions, number of miRNA reads and diversity of transcripts. Whereas EVs obtained by immunoaffinity yielded the purest subset of small EVs, highly comparable with results attained by ultracentrifugation combined with density gradient, precipitation and membrane affinity, sample purification by spin column chromatography indicated a tendency to isolate different subtypes of small EVs, which might also carry a distinct subset of miRNAs. Based on our results, different EV purification methods seem to preferentially isolate different subtypes of EVs with varying efficiencies. As a consequence, sequencing experiments and resulting miRNA profiles were also affected. Hence, the selection of a specific EV isolation method has to satisfy the respective research question and should be well considered. In strict adherence with the MISEV (minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles) guidelines, the importance of a combined evaluation of biophysical and proteomic EV characteristics alongside transcriptomic results was clearly demonstrated in this present study.
小细胞外囊泡(EVs)是细胞间通讯中大小为50-200纳米的介质,反映了其亲代细胞的生理和病理生理变化。因此,EVs在生物标志物检测方面具有巨大潜力。然而,通过小RNA测序对尿液EVs中携带的微小RNA(miRNA)货物进行下游筛选的可靠纯化方法尚未建立。为了填补这一知识空白,我们通过小RNA测序分析了从通过五种不同尿液EV纯化方法(旋转柱色谱法、免疫亲和法、膜亲和法、沉淀法以及超速离心结合密度梯度法)获得的人尿液EVs中提取的RNA。通过纳米颗粒跟踪分析、蛋白质免疫印迹分析和透射电子显微镜对尿液EVs进行了进一步表征。全面的EV表征确定了分离的囊泡在大小、浓度以及蛋白质组成方面存在显著的方法依赖性差异。尽管所有纯化方法都捕获了足够的总RNA以进行小RNA测序,但在文库大小、定位分布、miRNA读数数量和转录本多样性方面也观察到了方法依赖性差异。免疫亲和法获得的EVs产生了最纯的小EVs子集,与超速离心结合密度梯度法、沉淀法和膜亲和法获得的结果高度可比,旋转柱色谱法进行的样品纯化表明倾向于分离不同亚型的小EVs,这些小EVs可能也携带不同的miRNA子集。根据我们的结果,不同的EV纯化方法似乎以不同的效率优先分离不同亚型的EVs。因此,测序实验和由此产生的miRNA谱也受到了影响。因此,特定EV分离方法的选择必须满足各自的研究问题,并且应该得到充分考虑。在严格遵循MISEV(细胞外囊泡研究的最低信息)指南的情况下,本研究清楚地证明了结合评估生物物理和蛋白质组学EV特征以及转录组结果的重要性。
J Extracell Vesicles. 2019-9-27
J Extracell Vesicles. 2018-6-4
J Extracell Vesicles. 2018-12-18
Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucl Acids. 2023-12-30
Proteomes. 2023-5-6
J Extracell Vesicles. 2018-8-13
J Extracell Vesicles. 2018-6-4
Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2018-4-11
J Circ Biomark. 2017-6-12
J Cell Mol Med. 2017-4-6