University of Economics in Prague, W. Churchill Sq. 1938/4, 130 67, Prague 3, Žižkov, Czech Republic.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Apr;26(2):691-707. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00117-z. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
The development of behavioral ethics has brought forth a detailed understanding of the processes of moral perception, decision-making and behavior within and beyond organizations and communities. However, prescriptive recommendations of behavioral research regarding how to support an ethical environment often underestimate the specifics of organizational characteristics that may encourage the occurrence and persistence of dishonesty, especially regarding deception as a desired action in some instances by some employees and managers. Furthermore, behavioral research does not adequately recognize the notion that dishonesty can be sometimes viewed as an acceptable cost for some expected traits or skills of an employee such as intelligence or creativity. Under some conditions, deception can be even considered a moral, prosocial activity. Finally, formal ethics systems and situational measures to promote honesty may be inefficient or directly harmful. This article highlights questions of how to assess such factors in research on (un)ethical behavior within organizations.
行为伦理的发展使我们深入了解了组织和社区内外的道德感知、决策和行为过程。然而,关于如何支持道德环境的行为研究的规范性建议往往低估了组织特征的具体细节,这些特征可能会鼓励不诚实的发生和持续,尤其是在某些情况下,某些员工和经理将欺骗视为一种期望的行为。此外,行为研究没有充分认识到这样一种观点,即不诚实有时可以被视为员工的某些预期特征或技能(如智力或创造力)的可接受代价。在某些情况下,欺骗甚至可以被视为一种道德的、亲社会的活动。最后,促进诚实的正式伦理制度和情境措施可能效率低下或直接有害。本文强调了在组织内(不)伦理行为研究中如何评估这些因素的问题。