Ridder William H, Zhang Kai Ming, Karsolia Apoorva, Engles Michael, Burke James
Southern California College of Optometry, Marshall B. Ketchum University, Fullerton, California 92831.
Allergan, Plc., Irvine, California 92623.
Vis Neurosci. 2019 Jan;36:E008. doi: 10.1017/S0952523819000051.
Contrast sensitivity functions reveal information about a subject's overall visual ability and have been investigated in several species of nonhuman primates (NHPs) with experimentally induced amblyopia and glaucoma. However, there are no published studies comparing contrast sensitivity functions across these species of normal NHPs. The purpose of this investigation was to compare contrast sensitivity across these primates to determine whether they are similar. Ten normal humans and eight normal NHPs (Macaca fascicularis) took part in this project. Previously published data from Macaca mulatta and Macaca nemestrina were also compared. Threshold was operationally defined as two misses in a row for a descending method of limits. A similar paradigm was used for the humans except that the descending method of limits was combined with a spatial, two-alternative forced choice (2-AFC) technique. The contrast sensitivity functions were fit with a double exponential function. The averaged peak contrast sensitivity, peak spatial frequency, acuity, and area under the curve for the humans were 268.9, 3.40 cpd, 27.3 cpd, and 2345.4 and for the Macaca fascicularis were 99.2, 3.93 cpd, 26.1 cpd, and 980.9. A two-sample t-test indicated that the peak contrast sensitivities (P = 0.001) and areas under the curve (P = 0.010) were significantly different. The peak spatial frequencies (P = 0.150) and the extrapolated visual acuities (P = 0.763) were not different. The contrast sensitivities for the Macaca fascicularis, Macaca mulatta, and Macaca nemestrina were qualitatively and quantitatively similar. The contrast sensitivity functions for the NHPs had lower peak contrast sensitivities and areas under the curve than the humans. Even though different methods have been used to measure contrast sensitivity in different species of NHP, the functions are similar. The contrast sensitivity differences and similarities between humans and NHPs need to be considered when using NHPs to study human disease.
对比敏感度函数揭示了受试者的整体视觉能力信息,并且已经在几种患有实验性弱视和青光眼的非人灵长类动物(NHP)中进行了研究。然而,目前尚无已发表的研究比较这些正常NHP物种之间的对比敏感度函数。本研究的目的是比较这些灵长类动物的对比敏感度,以确定它们是否相似。十名正常人类和八只正常NHP(食蟹猴)参与了该项目。还比较了先前发表的恒河猴和豚尾猴的数据。对于极限递减法,阈值在操作上被定义为连续两次未命中。人类使用了类似的范式,只是极限递减法与空间二择一强迫选择(2-AFC)技术相结合。对比敏感度函数用双指数函数拟合。人类的平均峰值对比敏感度、峰值空间频率、视力和曲线下面积分别为268.9、3.40周/度、27.3周/度和2345.4,食蟹猴的分别为99.2、3.93周/度、26.1周/度和980.9。两样本t检验表明,峰值对比敏感度(P = 0.001)和曲线下面积(P = 0.010)存在显著差异。峰值空间频率(P = 0.150)和外推视力(P = 0.763)没有差异。食蟹猴、恒河猴和豚尾猴的对比敏感度在定性和定量上相似。NHP的对比敏感度函数的峰值对比敏感度和曲线下面积低于人类。尽管在不同的NHP物种中使用了不同的方法来测量对比敏感度,但这些函数是相似的。在使用NHP研究人类疾病时,需要考虑人类和NHP之间对比敏感度的差异和相似性。