University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Lewis University.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2019 Oct 1;44(5):765-787. doi: 10.1215/03616878-7611647.
Spending on direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) for prescription pharmaceuticals has risen to record levels, five times as much as in 1996 in inflation-adjusted dollars. Major health care provider organizations have called for additional regulation of DTCA. These organizations argue that the negative impact of such advertising outweighs the informational value claimed by the pharmaceutical industry. The industry maintains that further restrictions on DTCA are not warranted because it is successfully self-regulating via "guiding principles" for DTCA as certified by firm executives.
The authors measured recent industry spending on DTCA and used regression models of Nielsen Monitor-Plus data to assess pharmaceutical firm self-regulation after the public disclosure of noncompliance with industry self-regulatory principles, specifically regarding the exposure of children and adolescents to broadcast advertisements for erectile dysfunction drugs.
Public disclosure of noncompliance with self-regulatory DTCA standards did not bring advertising into compliance. Results demonstrate that firms failed to meet the industry standard during every quarter of the six-year period of this study.
Results support previous research findings that pharmaceutical self-regulation is a deceptive blocking strategy rather than a means for the industry to police itself. Policy recommendations include broadcast restrictions on adult content and deincentivizing DTCA via tax reform.
直接面向消费者的药品广告(DTCA)支出已创历史新高,按通胀调整后计算是 1996 年的五倍。主要医疗保健提供商组织呼吁对 DTCA 进行额外监管。这些组织认为,此类广告的负面影响超过了制药行业声称的信息价值。该行业坚称,没有理由进一步限制 DTCA,因为它通过公司高管认证的 DTCA“指导原则”成功地进行了自我监管。
作者衡量了最近行业在 DTCA 上的支出,并使用尼尔森监测+数据的回归模型,评估了制药公司在自我监管的 DTCA 标准违规被公开披露后的自我监管情况,具体涉及儿童和青少年接触广播广告宣传勃起功能障碍药物的问题。
违反自我监管的 DTCA 标准的公开披露并没有使广告合规。研究结果表明,在本研究的六年期间,每家公司在每个季度都未能达到行业标准。
研究结果支持先前的研究发现,即制药行业的自我监管是一种欺骗性的封锁策略,而不是行业自我监管的手段。政策建议包括对成人内容的广播限制,以及通过税收改革来抑制 DTCA。