National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, and.
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jun 1;17(6):662-668. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7266.
This study assessed uptake of the Oncotype DX 21-gene assay over time and characterized which sociodemographic and clinical factors are associated with test uptake among women with lymph node-positive (LN+), hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Invasive breast cancer cases diagnosed in 2010 through 2013 were included from a SEER database linked to 21-gene assay results performed at Genomic Health's Clinical Laboratory. Factors associated with 21-gene assay uptake were identified using a multivariable logistic regression model.
Uptake of the 21-gene assay increased over time and differed by race, socioeconomic status (SES), and age. In the multivariable model, when clinical and SES variables were controlled for, racial differences in test uptake were no longer observed. Private insurance status was associated with higher odds of 21-gene assay uptake (Medicaid vs private insurance: adjusted odds ratio, 0.86; P=.02), and high area-level SES was associated with an increased odds of uptake (quintile 5 vs 1: adjusted odds ratio, 1.6; P<.001). Demographic factors such as age and marital status influenced test uptake, and use varied greatly by geographic region. Uptake of the 21-gene assay increased over time and preceded the assay's inclusion in the NCCN Guidelines for LN+ breast cancer. Differences in uptake by race, SES, and age have persisted over time. However, when clinical and SES variables were controlled for, racial differences in assay uptake were no longer observed. Socioeconomic variables, such as health insurance type and area-level SES, were associated with assay uptake.
Future research should continue to document practice patterns related to the 21-gene assay. Given variation in testing associated with area-level SES, insurance coverage, and geographic region, interventions to understand and reduce differential uptake are needed to ensure equitable access to this genomic test.
本研究评估了时间推移过程中 Oncotype DX 21 基因检测的采用情况,并确定了哪些社会人口统计学和临床因素与淋巴结阳性(LN+)、激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性乳腺癌患者检测采用相关。
从 SEER 数据库中纳入了 2010 年至 2013 年间诊断的浸润性乳腺癌病例,并与在 Genomic Health 临床实验室进行的 21 基因检测结果相关联。使用多变量逻辑回归模型确定与 21 基因检测采用相关的因素。
21 基因检测的采用率随时间推移而增加,且因种族、社会经济地位(SES)和年龄而异。在多变量模型中,当控制临床和 SES 变量时,检测采用方面的种族差异不再存在。私人保险状况与 21 基因检测采用的可能性更高相关(医疗补助与私人保险:调整后的优势比,0.86;P=.02),高地区 SES 与增加的采用可能性相关(五分位数 5 与 1:调整后的优势比,1.6;P<.001)。人口统计学因素如年龄和婚姻状况影响检测采用,且地域差异很大。21 基因检测的采用率随时间推移而增加,且早于该检测被纳入 NCCN 指南用于 LN+乳腺癌。按种族、SES 和年龄划分的采用率差异随着时间的推移而持续存在。然而,当控制临床和 SES 变量时,检测采用方面的种族差异不再存在。社会经济变量,如健康保险类型和地区 SES,与检测采用相关。
未来的研究应继续记录与 21 基因检测相关的实践模式。鉴于与地区 SES、保险覆盖范围和地理位置相关的检测差异,需要采取干预措施来了解和减少采用方面的差异,以确保公平获得这种基因组检测。