Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, and.
Blood Adv. 2019 Jun 25;3(12):1826-1836. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000050.
HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (Haplo-HCT) using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) has improved donor availability. However, a matched sibling donor (MSD) is still considered the optimal donor. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we compared outcomes after Haplo-HCT vs MSD in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). Data from 1205 adult CR1 AML patients (2008-2015) were analyzed. A total of 336 patients underwent PT-Cy-based Haplo-HCT and 869 underwent MSD using calcineurin inhibitor-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The Haplo-HCT group included more reduced-intensity conditioning (65% vs 30%) and bone marrow grafts (62% vs 7%), consistent with current practice. In multivariable analysis, Haplo-HCT and MSD groups were not different with regard to overall survival ( = .15), leukemia-free survival ( = .50), nonrelapse mortality ( = .16), relapse ( = .90), or grade II-IV acute GVHD ( = .98). However, the Haplo-HCT group had a significantly lower rate of chronic GVHD (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.48; < .001). Results of subgroup analyses by conditioning intensity and graft source suggested that the reduced incidence of chronic GVHD in Haplo-HCT is not limited to a specific graft source or conditioning intensity. Center effect and minimal residual disease-donor type interaction were not predictors of outcome. Our results indicate a lower rate of chronic GVHD after PT-Cy-based Haplo-HCT vs MSD using calcineurin inhibitor-based GVHD prophylaxis, but similar other outcomes, in patients with AML in CR1. Haplo-HCT is a viable alternative to MSD in these patients.
HLA 单倍体相合造血细胞移植(haplo-HCT)联合移植后环磷酰胺(PT-Cy)的应用提高了供者的可用性。然而,匹配的同胞供者(MSD)仍然被认为是最佳供者。本研究使用国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心数据库,比较了急性髓系白血病(AML)患者在完全缓解 1 期(CR1)接受 haplo-HCT 与 MSD 后的结果。分析了 2008 年至 2015 年间 1205 例成人 CR1 AML 患者的数据。共有 336 例患者接受了基于 PT-Cy 的 haplo-HCT,869 例患者接受了基于钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂的移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)预防的 MSD。haplo-HCT 组包括更多的低强度预处理(65%比 30%)和骨髓移植物(62%比 7%),与当前实践一致。多变量分析显示,在总生存( =.15)、无白血病生存( =.50)、非复发死亡率( =.16)、复发( =.90)或 II-IV 级急性 GVHD( =.98)方面,haplo-HCT 组与 MSD 组无差异。然而,haplo-HCT 组慢性 GVHD 的发生率明显较低(风险比,0.38;95%置信区间,0.30-0.48; <.001)。按预处理强度和移植物来源进行的亚组分析结果表明,haplo-HCT 中慢性 GVHD 发生率降低不仅限于特定的移植物来源或预处理强度。中心效应和微小残留病-供者类型相互作用不是结局的预测因素。我们的结果表明,在 AML 患者 CR1 中,与基于钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂的 GVHD 预防的 MSD 相比,PT-Cy 为基础的 haplo-HCT 后慢性 GVHD 的发生率较低,但其他结果相似。在这些患者中,haplo-HCT 是 MSD 的可行替代方案。