Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Agricultural Meteorology, College of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Science, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
NSW Department of Primary Industries, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, Wagga Wagga, NSW, 2650, Australia; Climate Change Research Centre and ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Environ Pollut. 2019 Sep;252(Pt A):835-845. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
Straw-return methods that neither negatively impact yield nor bring environmental risk are ideal patterns. To attain this goal, it is necessary to conduct field observation to evaluate the environmental influence of different straw-return methods. Therefore, we conducted a 2-year field study in 2015-2017 to investigate the emissions of methane (CH) and nitrous oxide (NO) and the changes in topsoil (0-20 cm) organic carbon (SOC) density in a typical Chinese rice-wheat rotation in the Eastern China. These measurements allowed a complete greenhouse gas accounting (net GWP and GHGI) of five treatments including: FP (no straw, plus fertilizer), FS (wheat straw plus fertilizer), FB (straw-derived biochar plus fertilizer), FSDI (wheat straw with straw-decomposing microbial inoculants plus fertilizer) and CK (control: no straw, no fertilizer). Average annual SOC sequestration rates were estimated to be 0.20, 0.97, 1.97 and 1.87 t C ha yr (0-20 cm) for the FP, FS, FB and FSDI treatments respectively. Relative to the FP treatment, the FS and FSDI treatments increased CH emissions by 12.4 and 17.9% respectively, but decreased NO emissions by 19.1 and 26.6%. Conversely, the FB treatment decreased CH emission by 7.2% and increased NO emission by 10.9% compared to FP. FB increased grain yield, but FS and FSDI did not. Compared to the net GWP (11.6 t CO-eq ha yr) and GHGI (1.20 kg CO-eq kg grain) of FP, the FS, FB and FSDI treatments reduced net GWP by 12.6, 59.9 and 34.6% and GHGI by 10.5, 65.8 and 37.7% respectively. In rice-wheat systems of eastern China, the environmentally beneficial effects of returning wheat straw can be greatly enhanced by application of straw-decomposing microbial inoculants or by applying straw-derived biochar.
秸秆还田方法既不影响产量,也没有环境风险,是理想的模式。为了达到这一目标,有必要进行田间观察,以评估不同秸秆还田方法对环境的影响。因此,我们在 2015-2017 年进行了为期两年的田间研究,以调查中国东部典型稻麦轮作系统中甲烷(CH)和氧化亚氮(NO)排放以及表土(0-20cm)有机碳(SOC)密度的变化。这些测量值使我们能够对包括以下五种处理方法的温室气体排放进行全面核算(净 GWP 和 GHGI):FP(无秸秆,加肥料)、FS(小麦秸秆加肥料)、FB(秸秆衍生生物炭加肥料)、FSDI(添加秸秆分解微生物接种剂的小麦秸秆加肥料)和 CK(对照:无秸秆,无肥料)。FP、FS、FB 和 FSDI 处理的平均年 SOC 固存率分别估计为 0.20、0.97、1.97 和 1.87tCha yr(0-20cm)。与 FP 处理相比,FS 和 FSDI 处理分别增加了 12.4%和 17.9%的 CH 排放,但减少了 19.1%和 26.6%的 NO 排放。相反,FB 处理与 FP 相比减少了 7.2%的 CH 排放,增加了 10.9%的 NO 排放。FB 提高了粮食产量,但 FS 和 FSDI 没有。与 FP 的净 GWP(11.6tCO-eq ha yr)和 GHGI(1.20kgCO-eq kg 谷物)相比,FS、FB 和 FSDI 处理分别减少了 12.6%、59.9%和 34.6%的净 GWP 和 10.5%、65.8%和 37.7%的 GHGI。在中国东部稻麦系统中,通过应用秸秆分解微生物接种剂或应用秸秆衍生生物炭,可大大提高还田小麦秸秆的环境效益。