State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 821, Nanjing, 210008, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, PR China.
Nanjing Institute of Environmental Science, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing, 210042, PR China; Key Laboratory of Pesticide Environmental Assessment and Pollution Control, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing, 210042, PR China.
Chemosphere. 2019 Nov;234:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.030. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
The dual role of biochar for inhibiting soil acidification induced by nitrification was determined through two-step incubation experiments in this study. Ca(OH) or biochar was added respectively to adjust soil pH to the same values (pH 5.15 and 5.85), and then the amended soils were incubated in the presence of urea for 70 days. The results showed that compared with Ca(OH) treatment, both rice straw biochar and peanut straw biochar inhibited the decrease in soil pH and the increase in exchangeable acidity during the incubation. The application of biochars suppressed soil nitrification during the incubation, and thus reduced 7.5 mmol kg and 1.4 mmol kg protons released from nitrification compared to Ca(OH) treatments. Compared with Ca(OH) treatment, the ammonia-oxidizing bacteria population size was decreased by 8% and 12% in rice straw biochar and peanut straw biochar treatments respectively, which was the main responsibility for the inhibited nitrification after biochar application. In addition, the application of rice straw biochar and peanut straw biochar increased soil pH buffering capacity (pHBC) respectively by 22% and 32%. The increased pHBC played the main role (75%) in inhibiting the acidification of the soil amended with peanut straw biochar, while the rice straw biochar inhibited soil acidification mainly through suppressing nitrification during the incubation. Overall, compared with lime application, biochars can inhibit soil acidification caused by urea application through suppressing the nitrification process and improving the resistance of soils to acidification. The crop residue biochars presented a longer-lasting effect on ameliorating acidic soils than mineral lime.
本研究通过两步培养实验确定了生物炭在抑制硝化作用引起的土壤酸化中的双重作用。分别添加 Ca(OH)₂或生物炭来调节土壤 pH 值至相同水平(pH 值为 5.15 和 5.85),然后在添加尿素的情况下将处理后的土壤进行 70 天的培养。结果表明,与 Ca(OH)₂处理相比,水稻秸秆生物炭和花生产物炭均能抑制培养过程中土壤 pH 值的降低和可交换酸度的增加。生物炭的应用抑制了培养过程中的土壤硝化作用,因此与 Ca(OH)₂处理相比,从硝化作用中释放出的质子分别减少了 7.5 mmol kg 和 1.4 mmol kg。与 Ca(OH)₂处理相比,水稻秸秆生物炭和花生产物炭处理中氨氧化细菌数量分别减少了 8%和 12%,这是生物炭应用后硝化作用受到抑制的主要原因。此外,水稻秸秆生物炭和花生产物炭的应用分别使土壤 pH 缓冲容量(pHBC)增加了 22%和 32%。增加的 pHBC 在抑制添加花生产物炭的土壤酸化中起主要作用(75%),而水稻秸秆生物炭主要通过抑制培养过程中的硝化作用来抑制土壤酸化。总体而言,与石灰应用相比,生物炭通过抑制硝化过程和提高土壤对酸化的抵抗力,可以抑制尿素应用引起的土壤酸化。与矿物石灰相比,作物残渣生物炭对改良酸性土壤具有更长的效果。