Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Aug;97:92-95. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.05.020. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
Previous surveys of Australian primary care physicians' attitudes regarding epilepsy and persons with epilepsy (PWE), conducted 20-30 years ago, identified the need for further education in epilepsy care for frontline clinicians. This follow-up study of general practitioners (GPs) in Sydney was conducted to determine the degree of changes in knowledge, attitudes, and management of PWE, with the purpose of evaluating if there had been significant improvement during this period.
A questionnaire, evaluating various aspects of epilepsy care, including investigations, preferred healthcare provider (HCP), and attitudes toward epilepsy was developed, largely based on the previous work, piloted, and completed by a representative sample of Sydney GPs.
A total of 52 completed responses were received. Thirty-six out of 47 GPs (77%) chose neurologists as the most important HCP followed by the GP (9/47; 18.7%). Almost half of the GPs (25/51; 49%) mentioned that they never initiated antiepileptic medication (AEM) therapy by themselves yet half of these GPs would alter the neurologist's regimen, without necessitating referral back to that neurologist. Another 27% (14/51 GPs) rarely commenced AEM therapy. Six out of 50 GPs did not mention an electroencephalogram (EEG) as a routine investigation, and 21/50 did not mention magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as routine for PWE. The five most commonly used AEMs, identified by at least 10% of respondents, were sodium valproate (42), carbamazepine (37), levetiracetam (31), lamotrigine (16), and phenytoin (15). Emotional, behavioral, and psychosocial issues were perceived to be more common among PWE; however, they could contribute equally well to society as people without epilepsy.
The results of the study indicate a perceptual shift regarding GP's attitudes to epilepsy; however, there remain deficiencies in knowledge, particularly with regard to investigations and management. The study highlights the need for more formal training of GPs in caring for PWE.
过去对澳大利亚初级保健医生对癫痫和癫痫患者(PWE)的态度进行的调查是在 20-30 年前进行的,这些调查发现需要进一步对一线临床医生进行癫痫护理教育。本研究对悉尼的全科医生(GP)进行了随访,以确定 PWE 的知识、态度和管理的变化程度,目的是评估在此期间是否有显著改善。
我们开发了一份调查问卷,评估了癫痫护理的各个方面,包括调查、首选医疗保健提供者(HCP)和对癫痫的态度,主要基于之前的工作,经过试验后由悉尼 GP 的代表性样本完成。
共收到 52 份完整回复。在 47 名全科医生中,有 36 名(77%)选择神经病学家作为最重要的 HCP,其次是全科医生(9/47;18.7%)。近一半的全科医生(25/51;49%)表示他们从未自行开始抗癫痫药物(AEM)治疗,但其中一半的全科医生会在不要求返回该神经病学家的情况下改变该神经病学家的治疗方案。另外 27%(14/51 名全科医生)很少开始 AEM 治疗。50 名全科医生中有 6 名未提及脑电图(EEG)作为常规检查,21 名全科医生未提及磁共振成像(MRI)作为 PWE 的常规检查。至少有 10%的受访者提到的五种最常用的 AEM 是丙戊酸钠(42)、卡马西平(37)、左乙拉西坦(31)、拉莫三嗪(16)和苯妥英(15)。全科医生认为情绪、行为和心理社会问题在 PWE 中更为常见;然而,他们作为没有癫痫的人同样可以为社会做出贡献。
研究结果表明,全科医生对癫痫的态度发生了观念转变;然而,他们在知识方面仍然存在不足,特别是在调查和管理方面。该研究强调了需要对全科医生进行更正规的培训,以照顾 PWE。