Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Aug;72(8):1254-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.05.027. Epub 2019 May 24.
Smiling is a fundamental component of social interactions. Significant challenges arise for patients with facial palsy. One of the key procedures for dynamic smile restoration is the microneurovascular transfer of a gracilis muscle. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of dynamic smile reanimation surgery using the free gracilis muscle unit in patients with facial palsy.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting surgical outcomes of dynamic smile restoration using free gracilis muscles identified from EMBASE, Medline, and Web of Science databases from their inception to March 15, 2018. Two-stage screening and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Pooled proportions were calculated using random-effects models.
Thirty-one studies including 1647 patients who underwent 1739 free gracilis flaps were included. Twelve (38.7%) studies measured perioperative smile excursion change using six different tools. Six of these studies were homogeneous and were used in meta-analyses of smile excursion improvement, which revealed a mean change of 7.5 mm (95% CI 6.0-9.0 mm, I 86.7%) perioperatively. Twenty (64.5%) studies reported perioperative complications, and pooled proportions of flap failures were of 2.9% (95% CI 1.3-4.5%, I 47.7%).
Dynamic smile restoration using a free gracilis muscle may represent an effective procedure to regain oral commissure motion and is associated with an approximately 3% rate of flap failure. Masseteric nerve coaptations lead to larger improvements in perioperative smile excursion (10 mm) than cross-facial nerve grafts (6.8 mm). Future studies with homogeneous reporting of smile excursion and patient-reported outcome measures are needed.
微笑是社交互动的基本组成部分。然而,对于面瘫患者来说,这可能会面临重大挑战。其中一种关键的动态笑容修复程序是通过显微血管神经移植腹直肌。我们旨在评估使用游离腹直肌单位对面瘫患者进行动态笑容再激活手术的有效性和安全性。
我们从 EMBASE、Medline 和 Web of Science 数据库中对自成立以来至 2018 年 3 月 15 日报道使用游离腹直肌进行动态笑容恢复的手术结果的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。两名独立的评审员进行了两阶段筛选和数据提取。使用随机效应模型计算合并比例。
纳入了 31 项研究,共 1647 例患者,共进行了 1739 次游离腹直肌皮瓣手术。其中 12 项(38.7%)研究使用 6 种不同的工具测量围手术期微笑幅度变化。这 6 项研究是同质的,用于荟萃分析微笑幅度改善,结果显示手术前后平均改善幅度为 7.5mm(95%CI 6.0-9.0mm,I 86.7%)。20 项(64.5%)研究报告了围手术期并发症,皮瓣失败的合并比例为 2.9%(95%CI 1.3-4.5%,I 47.7%)。
使用游离腹直肌进行动态笑容修复可能是恢复口角运动的有效方法,其皮瓣失败率约为 3%。与面横神经移植(6.8mm)相比,咬肌神经吻合术可使围手术期微笑幅度改善更大(10mm)。需要进一步开展具有同质微笑幅度报告和患者报告结局测量的研究。