Struller Florian, Horvath Philipp, Solass Wiebke, Weinreich Frank-Jürgen, Strumberg Dirk, Kokkalis Marios K, Fischer Imma, Meisner Christoph, Königsrainer Alfred, Reymond Marc A
Department of General and Transplant Surgery, Tübingen, University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019 May 13;11:1758835919846402. doi: 10.1177/1758835919846402. eCollection 2019.
Efficacy of second-line systemic chemotherapy in recurrent gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (RGCPM) is limited. We assessed the feasibility, safety and possible efficacy of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with RGCPM after ⩾1 line of palliative intravenous chemotherapy.
In this open-label, single-arm, monocentric phase II ICH-GCP clinical trial, patients were scheduled for three courses of PIPAC with cisplatin 7.5 mg/m and doxorubicin 1.5 mg/m (PIPAC C/D) every 6 weeks. Patients with bowel obstruction or extraperitoneal metastasis were ineligible. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors based on clinical records. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), median time to progression (TTP), peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI), histological regression and ascites volume. Safety and tolerability were assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4, quality of life (QoL) by EORTC-QLQ30 questionnaire.
A total of 25 patients were enrolled and available for the analysis of the primary endpoint. Of those 25 patients, 10 (40%) had a radiological complete, partial response or stable disease. Median OS [intention to treat (ITT)] was 6.7 months, median TTP was 2.7 months. Complete or major regression on histology were observed in 9/25 patients (36%, ITT) or 6/6 [100%, per protocol (PP)] patients. There were no suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions, no treatment-related deaths, no CTCAE grade 4 toxicity and three (12%) grade 3 toxicities. Changes in the QLQ-C30 scores during PIPAC C/D therapy were small and not significant.
PIPAC C/D was well tolerated and active in patients with RGCPM. Survival was encouraging. Randomized controlled trials should now be designed in this indication.
二线全身化疗对复发性胃癌伴腹膜转移(RGCPM)的疗效有限。我们评估了在接受过≥1线姑息性静脉化疗的RGCPM患者中进行加压腹腔内气溶胶化疗(PIPAC)的可行性、安全性及可能的疗效。
在这项开放标签、单臂、单中心的II期国际协调会议(ICH)- 药品临床试验管理规范(GCP)临床试验中,患者计划每6周接受3个疗程的PIPAC,顺铂剂量为7.5mg/m²,阿霉素剂量为1.5mg/m²(PIPAC C/D)。肠梗阻或腹膜外转移患者不符合入组条件。主要终点是基于临床记录,按照实体瘤疗效评价标准得出的临床获益率(CBR)。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、疾病进展中位时间(TTP)、腹膜癌指数(PCI)、组织学消退及腹水体积。通过不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)第4版评估安全性和耐受性,通过欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷(EORTC-QLQ30)评估生活质量(QoL)。
共纳入25例患者并可用于主要终点分析。在这25例患者中,10例(40%)出现影像学完全缓解、部分缓解或疾病稳定。总生存期 [意向性治疗(ITT)] 中位数为6.7个月,疾病进展中位时间为2.7个月。25例患者中有9例(36%,ITT)或6例(100%,符合方案(PP))患者出现组织学完全或主要消退。未出现疑似意外严重不良反应,无治疗相关死亡,无CTCAE 4级毒性反应,3例(12%)出现3级毒性反应。PIPAC C/D治疗期间QLQ-C30评分变化较小且无统计学意义。
PIPAC C/D在RGCPM患者中耐受性良好且有活性。生存期令人鼓舞。现在应针对该适应症设计随机对照试验。