Department of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jul;20(7):109-120. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12663. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
The major challenge in treating a mobile target is obtaining the temporal and spatial information imaging and treatment details. This phantom study quantitatively evaluates the geometric and dosimetric effects of various treatment techniques under different respiratory patterns. The regular motion model was a sinusoidal waveform with a longitudinal range of ±1.5 cm and a period of 4 sec, while irregular motion models were generated by extracting signals from clinical cases. Helical CT for a static target and 4D CT with retrospective sorting were acquired. Phase bin, maximum, and average intensity projection (MIP and AIP) CT datasets were reconstructed. RapidArc and IMRT plans were generated on static and moving target CT datasets with different motion patterns using the phase-based gating and nongating treatment. Dose measurements were performed using EBT3 films. Dose profile and gamma analysis (±3%/1 mm criteria) were used for dose comparisons. For the irregular motions, internal target volume variations between AIP and MIP datasets (AIP/MIP) had slight differences (-6.2% to -7.7%) for gated plans, and larger differences (-12.3% to -15.2%) for nongated plans. Dosimetric measurements showed a high gamma passing rate (>98.5%) for the static plan in the target region, while the AIP and MIP gated plans had average passing rates of 92.2% ± 5.7% and 85.8% ± 9.5%, respectively. Nongated plans had significantly lower and deviated passing rates, while the AIP and MIP plans had passing rates of 43.6% ± 22.2% and 66.7% ± 28.2%, respectively (p < 0.05). Lung stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment delivered with the gated technique did not compromise the gross tumor volumes coverage, and was insensitive to the breathing irregularities and plan techniques. Adequate margins should be accounted to cover the mis-gating effect when using the phase-based gating under irregular motion.
治疗移动目标的主要挑战是获取时空信息成像和治疗细节。这项体模研究定量评估了不同呼吸模式下各种治疗技术的几何和剂量学效应。规则运动模型是一个纵向范围为±1.5cm、周期为 4 秒的正弦波,而不规则运动模型则是通过从临床病例中提取信号生成的。获取了静态目标的螺旋 CT 和带回顾性排序的 4D CT。重建了相位 bin、最大和平均强度投影(MIP 和 AIP)CT 数据集。使用基于相位的门控和非门控治疗,在静态和移动目标 CT 数据集上生成了 RapidArc 和 IMRT 计划。使用 EBT3 胶片进行剂量测量。使用剂量分布和伽马分析(±3%/1mm 标准)进行剂量比较。对于不规则运动,门控计划的 AIP 和 MIP 数据集之间的内部靶区体积变化(AIP/MIP)差异较小(-6.2%至-7.7%),而非门控计划的差异较大(-12.3%至-15.2%)。剂量测量显示,目标区域内静态计划的高伽马通过率(>98.5%),而 AIP 和 MIP 门控计划的平均通过率分别为 92.2%±5.7%和 85.8%±9.5%。非门控计划的通过率明显较低且偏差较大,而 AIP 和 MIP 计划的通过率分别为 43.6%±22.2%和 66.7%±28.2%(p<0.05)。使用门控技术进行的肺部立体定向体部放射治疗不会影响大体肿瘤体积的覆盖,并且对呼吸不规则和计划技术不敏感。在不规则运动下使用基于相位的门控时,应考虑足够的边缘来覆盖误门控效应。