Wang H J, Liu Y, Ge W W, Bian L D, Pu L F, Jiang Y, Zhu G F, Jin X W, Li J
Department of Anethesiology and Perioperative Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Wang Hejie now works in the Department of Anesthesiology, Wenzhou Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital), Wenzhou 325027, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 18;99(23):1809-1813. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.23.012.
To compare the perioperative effects of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in radical mastectomy. One hundred and fifty patients,undergoing radical mastectomy from May 2016 to Jan 2019,the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, were randomly divided into SAPB group, ESPB group and control group. Patients in SAPB group and ESPB group were received corresponding blocks before induction of general anesthesia. The control group was only received routine general anesthesia without any block. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was performed in all the patients postoperatively. The VAS score at rest or coughing and Ramsay score at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 h after operation were compared among the three groups. The intraoperative dosages of propofol and remifentanil,press times and sufentanil cumulative dosage of PCIA in 48 hours after operation, postoperative rehabilitation indicators and adverse effects were all compared. In all the three groups,the VAS scores at rest and coughing increased first and then decreased 2 h to 48 h after operation. The VAS scores in SAPB group and ESPB group were lower than that in control group (0.05), whereas, no significant difference was observed between SAPB group and ESPB group (0.05). For Ramsay score, among the three groups, there were no significances of the main effects of group and time point, as well as interaction effect (all 0.05). The intraoperative dosages of propofol and remifentanil in SAPB group and ESPB group were lower than those in control group (0.05), the press times and sufentanil cumulative dosage of PCIA after operation were also lower than those in control group (0.05). There was no significant difference in feeding time after operation among the three groups (0.05). The times of first anal exhaust, ambulation and hospitalization after operation in ESPB group and SAPB group were significantly shorter than those in control group (0.05). However, there was no significant difference between ESPB group and SAPB group in postoperative rehabilitation indicators mentioned above (0.05). The incidences of skin itching and nausea in ESPB and SAPB groups were lower than those in control group (0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of vomiting among the three groups (0.05). Both SAPB and ESPB can provide good and safe analgesia for radical mastectomy,with equivalent performances in analgesia and adverse effect.
比较超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞(SAPB)和竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)在乳腺癌根治术中的围手术期效果。2016年5月至2019年1月在温州医科大学附属第二医院育英儿童医院接受乳腺癌根治术的150例患者被随机分为SAPB组、ESPB组和对照组。SAPB组和ESPB组患者在全身麻醉诱导前接受相应的阻滞。对照组仅接受常规全身麻醉,未进行任何阻滞。所有患者术后均行患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)。比较三组患者术后静息或咳嗽时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)以及术后2、4、8、12、24、48 h的Ramsay评分。比较三组患者术中丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼用量、术后48小时PCIA的按压次数和舒芬太尼累积用量、术后康复指标及不良反应。三组患者术后2~48 h静息和咳嗽时的VAS评分均先升高后降低。SAPB组和ESPB组的VAS评分低于对照组(P<0.05),而SAPB组和ESPB组之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。对于Ramsay评分,三组之间组间、时间点主效应以及交互效应均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。SAPB组和ESPB组术中丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼用量低于对照组(P<0.05),术后PCIA的按压次数和舒芬太尼累积用量也低于对照组(P<0.05)。三组术后进食时间无显著差异(P>0.05)。ESPB组和SAPB组术后首次排气、下床活动及住院时间均明显短于对照组(P<0.05)。然而,ESPB组和SAPB组上述术后康复指标之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。ESPB组和SAPB组皮肤瘙痒和恶心的发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。三组呕吐发生率无差异(P>0.05)。SAPB和ESPB均可为乳腺癌根治术提供良好、安全的镇痛效果,镇痛及不良反应表现相当。