Elsabeeny Walaa Y, Shehab Nahla N, Wadod Mohamed A, Elkady Mostafa A
Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
J Pain Res. 2020 Nov 12;13:2885-2894. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S274808. eCollection 2020.
Various analgesic modalities are adopted for perioperative analgesia in breast cancer surgeries. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intravenous morphine versus serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in breast cancer surgeries.
Seventy-five breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy from January 2020 to June 2020 were randomly allocated into 3 groups; the morphine group received morphine 0.1 mg/kg, the SAPB group received ultrasound-guided SAPB with 25 mL bupivacaine 0.25% and the ESPB group received ultrasound-guided ESPB with 25 mL bupivacaine 0.25%. A visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-10 was used to evaluate pain postoperatively, where 0 denotes no pain and 10 worst pain. If any patient in the 3 studied groups reported breakthrough pain with VAS ≥ 4 then a bolus of 3 mg morphine was given.
There was no difference in VAS scores between the 3 groups postoperatively. Morphine consumption was higher in the morphine group (9.19 ± 2.32 mg) than the SAPB group (4.00 ± 1.55 mg) and the ESPB group (4.20 ± 1.64 mg), respectively. First time to receive postoperative morphine was significantly longer for the ESPB and SAPB groups than the morphine group (20.40 ± 4.98 hours), (19.00 ± 5.9 hours), (5.00 ± 4.62 hours), respectively. Intraoperative hemodynamics and fentanyl consumption showed no difference between groups, whereas postoperative mean arterial blood pressure values at 2 and 4 hours were higher in the morphine group. Ramsay sedation score and postoperative nausea and vomiting values in the post anesthesia care unit were higher for the morphine group compared to the SAPB and ESPB groups. No complications related to the blocks were reported.
SAPB and ESPB can be used as an effective and safe alternative to opioids with fewer side effects in breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.
This trial was prospectively registered at Clinical Trials.gov on 22 January 2020 with registration number NCT04248608 (https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0009JS5&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0004LIG&ts=7&cx=-81xkwa).
乳腺癌手术围手术期镇痛采用了多种镇痛方式。本研究旨在比较静脉注射吗啡与前锯肌平面阻滞(SAPB)和竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)在乳腺癌手术中的疗效。
2020年1月至2020年6月期间接受改良根治性乳房切除术的75例乳腺癌患者被随机分为3组;吗啡组接受0.1mg/kg吗啡,SAPB组接受超声引导下的SAPB,注射25mL 0.25%布比卡因,ESPB组接受超声引导下的ESPB,注射25mL 0.25%布比卡因。采用0-10视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估术后疼痛,其中0表示无疼痛,10表示最剧烈疼痛。如果3个研究组中的任何患者报告爆发性疼痛且VAS≥4,则给予3mg吗啡推注。
3组术后VAS评分无差异。吗啡组的吗啡消耗量(9.19±2.32mg)分别高于SAPB组(4.00±1.55mg)和ESPB组(4.20±1.64mg)。ESPB组和SAPB组首次接受术后吗啡的时间分别显著长于吗啡组(20.40±4.98小时)、(19.00±5.9小时)、(5.00±4.62小时)。术中血流动力学和芬太尼消耗量在组间无差异,而吗啡组术后2小时和4小时的平均动脉血压值较高。与SAPB组和ESPB组相比,吗啡组在麻醉后护理单元的Ramsay镇静评分以及术后恶心和呕吐值更高。未报告与阻滞相关的并发症。
对于接受改良根治性乳房切除术的乳腺癌患者,SAPB和ESPB可作为一种有效且安全的阿片类药物替代方法,副作用更少。
本试验于2020年1月22日在ClinicalTrials.gov上进行前瞻性注册,注册号为NCT04248608(https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0009JS5&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0004LIG&ts=7&cx=-81xkwa)。