• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际贸易中动物源性食品的食品安全风险评估指南制定

Development of Food Safety Risk Assessment Guidelines for Foods of Animal Origin in International Trade .

作者信息

Hathaway Steve C

机构信息

Regulatory Authority of the Ministry of Agriculture, P.O. Box 646, Gisborne, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Food Prot. 1997 Nov;60(11):1432-1438. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-60.11.1432.

DOI:10.4315/0362-028X-60.11.1432
PMID:31207769
Abstract

The international food safety environment is currently in a unique period of reevaluation and change. In an emerging trading environment regulated more according to food safety requirements than nontariff trade protection barriers, food safety risk analysis is pivotal to future Codex activities and implementation of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement. Development of guidelines for food safety risk assessment requires determination of scope, internationally agreed definitions, general principles, guidelines tailored for each class of foodborne hazards, and linkages and interactions with risk management and risk communication. Food safety risk assessments need to be soundly based on science, should incorporate the four analytical steps of the risk assessment paradigm, and should be documented in a transparent and readily understandable form. The particular needs of Codex, the WTO, national governments, industry, and consumers need to be taken into account, and this includes identification of the essential linkages between risk assessment and the design of HACCP plans. With respect to chemical hazards in food, a risk assessment approach provides the opportunity to broaden the understanding of acceptable daily intakes, maximum residue levels, and their public health significance. Guidelines for chemicals in foods will inevitably have to address the differences between safety evaluation and a genuine risk assessment approach. With respect to microbiological hazards, the unique problems associated with risk assessment of living organisms in food make it likely that application of guidelines in the medium term will more commonly use qualitative approaches. In the absence of a history of safety evaluation according to a notionally zero risk baseline, as is the case with chemicals, the objective of microbiological risk analysis to reduce microbial risks to "the minimum which is technologically feasible and practical" represents a genuine focus for risk assessment. As risk assessment is increasing applied and internationally accepted guidelines become established, decision criteria for risk management arguably present the greatest challenge in establishing and maintaining quantitative SPS measures for food in international trade and judging their equivalence. However, the desire of all interested parties for scientifically justified food safety measures may be tempered according to the ability of the global scientific community to generate the necessary data and the political will to accept food safety programmes in different countries that have equivalent outputs.

摘要

当前,国际食品安全环境正处于一个重新评估和变革的特殊时期。在一个更多依据食品安全要求而非非关税贸易保护壁垒进行监管的新兴贸易环境中,食品安全风险分析对于未来食品法典委员会的活动以及世界贸易组织(WTO)《卫生与植物卫生措施协定》(SPS协定)的实施至关重要。制定食品安全风险评估指南需要确定范围、国际商定的定义、一般原则、针对各类食源性危害量身定制的指南,以及与风险管理和风险沟通的联系与互动。食品安全风险评估需要有坚实的科学依据,应纳入风险评估范式的四个分析步骤,并应以透明且易于理解的形式记录。需要考虑食品法典委员会、WTO、各国政府、行业和消费者的特殊需求,这包括确定风险评估与危害分析关键控制点(HACCP)计划设计之间的基本联系。就食品中的化学危害而言,风险评估方法为拓宽对每日允许摄入量、最大残留限量及其公共卫生意义的理解提供了契机。食品中化学物质的指南必然要解决安全评估与真正的风险评估方法之间的差异。就微生物危害而言,与食品中生物风险评估相关的独特问题使得中期应用指南更可能采用定性方法。与化学物质不同,食品微生物风险分析没有基于理论上零风险基线的安全评估历史,其将微生物风险降低到“技术上可行且实际可行的最低水平”这一目标代表了风险评估的真正重点。随着风险评估的应用日益广泛且国际认可的指南得以确立,风险管理的决策标准无疑是在国际贸易中建立和维持食品定量SPS措施并判断其等效性方面面临的最大挑战。然而,所有利益相关方对科学合理的食品安全措施的期望可能会根据全球科学界生成必要数据的能力以及接受不同国家具有同等成效的食品安全计划的政治意愿而有所缓和。

相似文献

1
Development of Food Safety Risk Assessment Guidelines for Foods of Animal Origin in International Trade .国际贸易中动物源性食品的食品安全风险评估指南制定
J Food Prot. 1997 Nov;60(11):1432-1438. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-60.11.1432.
2
A regulatory perspective on the potential uses of microbial risk assessment in international trade.关于微生物风险评估在国际贸易中潜在用途的监管视角。
Int J Food Microbiol. 1997 May 20;36(2-3):127-33. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(97)01263-4.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Tolerance limits and methodology: effect on international trade.公差限度与方法:对国际贸易的影响
J Food Prot. 1998 Nov;61(11):1571-8. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-61.11.1571.
7
Establishment of microbiological safety criteria for foods in international trade. International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods.国际贸易中食品微生物安全标准的制定。食品微生物标准国际委员会。
World Health Stat Q. 1997;50(1-2):119-23.
8
The role of veterinary epidemiology and veterinary services in complying with the World Trade Organization SPS agreement.兽医流行病学和兽医服务在遵守世界贸易组织《实施卫生与植物卫生措施协定》方面的作用。
Prev Vet Med. 2005 Feb;67(2-3):125-40. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.11.005. Epub 2005 Jan 4.
9
The precautionary principle and other non-tariff barriers to free and fair international food trade.预防原则及其他阻碍自由公平国际食品贸易的非关税壁垒。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2002 Jul;42(4):403-15. doi: 10.1080/20024091054201.
10
Does science speak clearly and fairly in trade and food safety disputes? The search for an optimal response of WTO adjudication to problematic international standard-making.在贸易和食品安全争端中,科学是否能清晰公正地发声?探寻世贸组织裁决对有问题的国际标准制定的最佳回应。
Food Drug Law J. 2013;68(1):97-114, ii-iii.