Bittel Carla
Med Hist. 2019 Jul;63(3):352-374. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2019.31.
In the first half of the nineteenth century, many Americans visited phrenological practitioners. Some clients were true believers, who consulted phrenology to choose an occupation, select a marriage partner and raise children. But, as this article demonstrates, many others consumed phrenology as an 'experiment', testing its validity as they engaged its practice. Consumers of 'practical phrenology' subjected themselves to examinations often to test the phrenologist and his practice against their own knowledge of themselves. They also tested whether phrenology was true, according to their own beliefs about race and gender. While historians have examined phrenology as a theory of the mind, we know less about its 'users' and how gender, race and class structured their engagement. Based on extensive archival research with letters and diaries, memoirs and marginalia, as well as phrenological readings, this study reveals how a continuum of belief existed around phrenology, from total advocacy to absolute denunciation, with lots of room for acceptance and rejection in between. Phrenologists' notebooks and tools of salesmanship also show how an experimental environment emerged where phrenologists themselves embraced a culture of testing. In an era of what Katherine Pandora has described as 'epistemological contests', audiences confronted new museums, performances and theatres of natural knowledge and judged their validity. This was also true for phrenology, which benefited from a culture of contested authority. As this article reveals, curiosity, experimentation and even scepticism among users actually helped keep phrenology alive for decades.
在19世纪上半叶,许多美国人拜访颅相学从业者。一些客户是虔诚的信徒,他们参考颅相学来选择职业、挑选结婚对象和养育子女。但是,正如本文所表明的,其他许多人将颅相学当作一种“实验”来接受,在实践过程中检验其有效性。“实用颅相学”的消费者常常让自己接受检查,以便根据自己对自身的了解来检验颅相学家及其做法。他们还根据自己对种族和性别的信念来检验颅相学是否正确。虽然历史学家已将颅相学作为一种心智理论进行了研究,但我们对其“使用者”以及性别、种族和阶级如何构建他们与颅相学的接触了解较少。基于对信件、日记、回忆录和旁注以及颅相学解读的广泛档案研究,本研究揭示了围绕颅相学存在着一个信念连续体,从完全拥护到绝对谴责,其间有很大的接受和拒绝空间。颅相学家的笔记本和推销工具也表明了一个实验环境是如何出现的,在这个环境中颅相学家自己接受了一种测试文化。在凯瑟琳·潘多拉所描述的“认识论竞争”时代,观众面对新的博物馆、自然知识表演和剧院,并评判它们的有效性。颅相学也是如此,它受益于一种权威受到质疑的文化。正如本文所揭示的,使用者的好奇心、实验甚至怀疑实际上帮助颅相学延续了几十年。