Hussain Abubakar Siddique Mustafa, Ghadzi Siti Maisharah Sheikh, Sulaiman Syed Azhar Syed, Alsahali Saud Mohammad, Khan Safiya Fatima
Discipline of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Penang, 11800, Malaysia.
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraidah, 51452, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
J Health Popul Nutr. 2025 Jan 22;44(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-00751-3.
Medication reconciliation has been acknowledged as a key intervention against medication errors. More than half of the medication errors that happen during care transitions are caused by unjustified medication discrepancies and up to one-third of these mistakes may be harmful. The study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of health care providers in on medication reconciliation process, pre and post educational intervention.
A hospital-based prospective quasi-experimental pre-post intervention study was conducted from November 2023 to February 2024 among 346 healthcare professionals (medical doctors, pharmacists and nurses) practicing in King Saud Hospital (KSH), Unayzah, Saudi Arabia. The subjects were recruited using the convenience sampling method.An educational intervention workshop was conducted among the healthcare professionals. The KAP was assessed before and after the educational intervention using a content and face validated self-administered questionnaire. The statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used to differentiate the mean response scores for knowledge, attitude, and practice domains, between pre and post intervention. Kruskal Wallis Test followed by Dunn's post hoc test was used to compare the mean response scores for knowledge, attitude and practice domains based on educational qualification and practicing experience for the pre and post-test period. The level of significance is determined at P < 0.05.
There was a significant improvement in the participants' knowledge, attitude and practice after the educational intervention with mean scores of 0.72 (SD = 1.67, p < 0.0001*), 0.76 (SD = 1.97, p < 0.0001*), and 0.56 (SD = 2.05, p = 0.001*) respectively. The overall KAP scores showed a statistically significant enhancement after the education intervention with a mean score difference of 2.04 (SD = 4.76, p < 0.0001*).Our study upholds that MedRec is highly valued by the participants due to its significant role in reducing medication errors and enhancing patient safety, and that it has the ability to recognize medication discrepancies and reduce adverse drug events.
The education intervention effectively influenced the knowledge, attitude and practice of healthcare professionals regarding medication reconciliation. This study underscores the importance of continuous education and training for healthcare professionals to minimize medication discrepancies and improve patient care.
用药核对已被公认为预防用药错误的关键干预措施。在护理转接过程中发生的用药错误,超过一半是由不合理的用药差异引起的,其中多达三分之一的错误可能是有害的。本研究旨在评估医疗保健提供者在用药核对过程中、教育干预前后的知识、态度和实践(KAP)。
2023年11月至2024年2月,在沙特阿拉伯乌奈宰的沙特国王医院(KSH)对346名医疗专业人员(医生、药剂师和护士)进行了一项基于医院的前瞻性准实验性干预前后研究。采用便利抽样法招募受试者。在医疗专业人员中举办了一次教育干预研讨会。使用经过内容和表面效度验证的自填式问卷在教育干预前后评估KAP。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)进行统计分析。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验来区分干预前后知识、态度和实践领域的平均反应得分。采用Kruskal Wallis检验,随后进行Dunn事后检验,以比较基于教育程度和实践经验的干预前后知识、态度和实践领域的平均反应得分。显著性水平设定为P < 0.05。
教育干预后,参与者的知识、态度和实践有显著改善,平均得分分别为0.72(标准差 = 1.67,p < 0.0001*)、0.76(标准差 = 1.97,p < 0.0001*)和0.56(标准差 = 2.05,p = 0.001*)。教育干预后,总体KAP得分在统计学上有显著提高,平均得分差异为2.04(标准差 = 4.76,p < 0.0001*)。我们的研究表明,用药核对因其在减少用药错误和提高患者安全方面的重要作用而受到参与者的高度重视,并且它有能力识别用药差异并减少药物不良事件。
教育干预有效地影响了医疗保健专业人员在用药核对方面的知识、态度和实践。本研究强调了对医疗保健专业人员进行持续教育和培训的重要性,以尽量减少用药差异并改善患者护理。