School of Computational Science and Engineering, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, 266 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, GA, 30332, U.S.A.
New York Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, 211 Fernow Hall, 226 Mann Drive, Ithaca, NY, 14853, U.S.A.
Conserv Biol. 2019 Oct;33(5):1023-1034. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13369. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
Ecological distance-based spatial capture-recapture models (SCR) are a promising approach for simultaneously estimating animal density and connectivity, both of which affect spatial population processes and ultimately species persistence. We explored how SCR models can be integrated into reserve-design frameworks that explicitly acknowledge both the spatial distribution of individuals and their space use resulting from landscape structure. We formulated the design of wildlife reserves as a budget-constrained optimization problem and conducted a simulation to explore 3 different SCR-informed optimization objectives that prioritized different conservation goals by maximizing the number of protected individuals, reserve connectivity, and density-weighted connectivity. We also studied the effect on our 3 objectives of enforcing that the space-use requirements of individuals be met by the reserve for individuals to be considered conserved (referred to as home-range constraints). Maximizing local population density resulted in fragmented reserves that would likely not aid long-term population persistence, and maximizing the connectivity objective yielded reserves that protected the fewest individuals. However, maximizing density-weighted connectivity or preemptively imposing home-range constraints on reserve design yielded reserves of largely spatially compact sets of parcels covering high-density areas in the landscape with high functional connectivity between them. Our results quantify the extent to which reserve design is constrained by individual home-range requirements and highlight that accounting for individual space use in the objective and constraints can help in the design of reserves that balance abundance and connectivity in a biologically relevant manner.
基于生态距离的空间捕获-再捕获模型(SCR)是一种很有前途的方法,可以同时估计动物密度和连通性,这两者都影响空间种群过程,并最终影响物种的生存。我们探讨了如何将 SCR 模型集成到保护区设计框架中,该框架明确承认个体的空间分布及其由于景观结构而导致的空间利用。我们将野生动物保护区的设计制定为一个受预算限制的优化问题,并进行了模拟,以探索 3 种不同的 SCR 启发式优化目标,这些目标通过最大化受保护个体的数量、保护区的连通性和密度加权连通性,优先考虑不同的保护目标。我们还研究了对我们的 3 个目标的影响,即通过保护区来满足个体的空间利用需求,以便将个体视为受保护的个体(称为家域约束)。最大化局部种群密度导致保护区破碎化,这可能无助于长期种群生存,而最大化连通性目标则保护了最少的个体。然而,最大化密度加权连通性或预先对保护区设计施加家域约束,会产生大量空间紧凑的包裹集合的保护区,这些包裹覆盖景观中的高密度区域,并且它们之间具有高功能连通性。我们的结果量化了保护区设计受到个体家域需求的限制程度,并强调了在目标和约束中考虑个体空间利用,可以帮助设计以生物学上相关的方式平衡丰度和连通性的保护区。