Suppr超能文献

新一代生物假体主动脉瓣置换术:无缝合与快速部署。

Surgical aortic valve replacement with new-generation bioprostheses: Sutureless versus rapid-deployment.

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera/University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Feb;159(2):432-442.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.02.135. Epub 2019 May 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to compare early clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of Perceval-S sutureless (Livanova, London, United Kingdom) and Intuity rapid-deployment (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calif) bioprostheses.

METHODS

Data from patients who underwent isolated or combined aortic valve replacement with Perceval-S and with Intuity bioprostheses at 18 cardiac surgical institutions were analyzed. Propensity matching was performed to identify similar patient cohorts.

RESULTS

We included 911 patients from March 2011 until May 2017. Perceval-S and Intuity valves were implanted in 349 (38.3%) and in 562 (61.7%) patients, respectively. Propensity score identified 117 matched pairs. In the matched cohort, device success was 99.1% and 100% in Perceval-S and Intuity group, respectively (P = 1.000). Thirty-day Valve Academic Research Consortium mortality occurred in 2 (1.7%) and 4 (3.4%) patients in the Perceval-S and in Intuity group, respectively (P = .6834). The rate of postoperative new permanent pacemaker implantation was 6% (7 patients) and 6.8% (8 patients) in the Perceval-S and in Intuity group, respectively (P = .7896). Perceval-S valve implantation requires significantly shorter aortic crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times than Intuity valve implantation (aortic crossclamp time for isolated, 52 ± 14 minutes vs 62 ± 24 minutes; P < .0001). Peak transaortic gradients were 22.4 ± 8.1 mm Hg and 19.6 ± 6.7 mm Hg (P = .0144), whereas mean gradients were 11.8 ± 4.7 mm Hg and 10.5 ± 3.9 mm Hg (P = .0388) in the Perceval-S and Intuity groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Sutureless Perceval-S and rapid-deployment Intuity bioprostheses provide good and similar early clinical and hemodynamic outcomes. Perceval-S valve implantation requires shorter crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, whereas Intuity valve implantation provides lower transaortic peak and mean gradients.

摘要

目的

本回顾性多中心研究旨在比较 Perceval-S 无缝线(Livanova,伦敦,英国)和 Intuity 快速部署(Edwards Lifesciences,加利福尼亚州欧文)生物瓣的早期临床和血液动力学结果。

方法

对 18 家心脏外科机构接受 Perceval-S 和 Intuity 生物瓣单独或联合主动脉瓣置换术的患者数据进行了分析。采用倾向评分匹配法识别相似的患者队列。

结果

我们纳入了 2011 年 3 月至 2017 年 5 月期间的 911 例患者。分别植入 349 例(38.3%)和 562 例(61.7%)患者的 Perceval-S 和 Intuity 瓣膜。倾向评分匹配确定了 117 对匹配。在匹配队列中,Perceval-S 和 Intuity 组的器械成功率分别为 99.1%和 100%(P=1.000)。术后 30 天 Valve Academic Research Consortium 死亡率分别为 Perceval-S 组 2 例(1.7%)和 Intuity 组 4 例(3.4%)(P=0.6834)。术后新发永久性起搏器植入率分别为 Perceval-S 组 7 例(6%)和 Intuity 组 8 例(6.8%)(P=0.7896)。与 Intuity 瓣膜植入相比,Perceval-S 瓣膜植入的主动脉阻断和体外循环时间明显更短(孤立时主动脉阻断时间,52±14 分钟比 62±24 分钟;P<0.0001)。跨主动脉峰值梯度分别为 22.4±8.1mmHg 和 19.6±6.7mmHg(P=0.0144),而平均梯度分别为 11.8±4.7mmHg 和 10.5±3.9mmHg(P=0.0388)。

结论

无缝线 Perceval-S 和快速部署 Intuity 生物瓣提供了良好且相似的早期临床和血液动力学结果。Perceval-S 瓣膜植入需要更短的主动脉阻断和体外循环时间,而 Intuity 瓣膜植入提供更低的跨主动脉峰值和平均梯度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验