• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2009 年至 2017 年欧盟不同职业群体中烟草控制政策与当前吸烟的关系。

Association between tobacco control policies and current smoking across different occupational groups in the EU between 2009 and 2017.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK

Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Aug;73(8):759-767. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211935. Epub 2019 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1136/jech-2018-211935
PMID:31213489
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the cross-national and longitudinal associations between national tobacco control policies and current smoking in 28 European Union (EU) member states between 2009 and 2017. It also examined the interaction between tobacco control policies and occupational status.

METHODS

We used data from four waves of Eurobarometer (2009, 2012, 2014 and 2017). The total sample size was 105 231 individuals aged ≥15 years. Tobacco Control Scale (TCS) scores (range 0 to 100) for years 2005, 2007, 2012 and 2014 measured the strength of country-level tobacco control policies. Logistic multilevel regression analyses with three levels (the individual, the country-year and the country) were performed with current smoker as the dependent variable.

RESULTS

Across the EU, average smoking prevalence fell from 29.4% (95% CI 28.5% to 30.2%) in 2009 to 26.3% (95% CI 25.4% to 27.1%) in 2017. We confirmed that cross-nationally, strong national tobacco control policies are significantly associated with a low probability of smoking. A one-point increase in TCS score was associated with lower odds of smoking (OR=0.990; 95% CI 0.983 to 0.998), but longitudinally (within-country) increases in TCS were not associated with current smoking (OR=0.999; 95% CI 0.994 to 1.005). Compared with those in manual occupations, the cross-national association was stronger in the upper occupational group (conditional OR for the interaction=0.985; 95% CI 0.978 to 0.992) and weaker in the economically inactive group (conditional OR for the interaction=1.009; 95% CI 1.005 to 1.013).

CONCLUSION

Differences in tobacco control policies between countries were associated with the probability of smoking but the changes in TCS within countries over time were not. Differences between countries in tobacco control policies were found to be most strongly associated with the likelihood of smoking in the highest occupational groups and were found to have only a weak association with smoking among the economically inactive in this sample.

摘要

背景

本研究调查了 2009 年至 2017 年间 28 个欧盟成员国的国家烟草控制政策与当前吸烟之间的跨国和纵向关联,并检验了烟草控制政策与职业地位之间的相互作用。

方法

我们使用了四轮欧洲民意调查(2009 年、2012 年、2014 年和 2017 年)的数据。总样本量为 105231 名年龄≥15 岁的个体。2005 年、2007 年、2012 年和 2014 年的烟草控制量表(TCS)评分(范围为 0 至 100)衡量了国家一级烟草控制政策的强度。以当前吸烟者为因变量,采用个体、国家-年份和国家三级的逻辑多层回归分析。

结果

在整个欧盟,平均吸烟率从 2009 年的 29.4%(95%CI 28.5%至 30.2%)下降到 2017 年的 26.3%(95%CI 25.4%至 27.1%)。我们证实,在跨国层面上,强有力的国家烟草控制政策与吸烟概率较低显著相关。TCS 评分每增加 1 分,吸烟的可能性就会降低(OR=0.990;95%CI 0.983 至 0.998),但在纵向(国家内),TCS 的增加与当前吸烟无关(OR=0.999;95%CI 0.994 至 1.005)。与从事体力劳动的人相比,在较高职业群体中,这种跨国关联更强(交互作用的条件比值=0.985;95%CI 0.978 至 0.992),而在经济不活跃群体中则较弱(交互作用的条件比值=1.009;95%CI 1.005 至 1.013)。

结论

国家间烟草控制政策的差异与吸烟概率有关,但随着时间的推移,各国 TCS 的变化与吸烟无关。在本研究中,发现国家间烟草控制政策的差异与最高职业群体吸烟的可能性最密切相关,而与经济不活跃群体吸烟的关联较弱。

相似文献

1
Association between tobacco control policies and current smoking across different occupational groups in the EU between 2009 and 2017.2009 年至 2017 年欧盟不同职业群体中烟草控制政策与当前吸烟的关系。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Aug;73(8):759-767. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211935. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
2
Tobacco control policies and smoking among older adults: a longitudinal analysis of 10 European countries.烟草控制政策与老年人吸烟行为:10 个欧洲国家的纵向分析。
Addiction. 2019 Jun;114(6):1076-1085. doi: 10.1111/add.14577. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
3
Tobacco control policy and socio-economic inequalities in smoking in 27 European countries.27个欧洲国家的烟草控制政策与吸烟方面的社会经济不平等现象
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Aug 1;165:79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.05.020. Epub 2016 May 28.
4
Relation between national-level tobacco control policies and individual-level voluntary home smoking bans in Europe.欧洲国家级烟草控制政策与个人层面自愿在家中禁烟之间的关系。
Tob Control. 2016 Jan;25(1):60-5. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051819. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
5
Impact of tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and quit ratios in 27 European Union countries from 2006 to 2014.2006 年至 2014 年 27 个欧盟国家控烟政策对吸烟率和戒烟率的影响。
Tob Control. 2019 Jan;28(1):101-109. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054119. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
6
Effect of nationwide tobacco control policies on smoking cessation in high and low educated groups in 18 European countries.18个欧洲国家全国烟草控制政策对高学历和低学历群体戒烟的影响。
Tob Control. 2008 Aug;17(4):248-55. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.024265. Epub 2008 May 15.
7
Are smokers "hardening" or rather "softening"? An ecological and multilevel analysis across 28 European Union countries.吸烟者是“变硬”还是“变软”?对 28 个欧盟国家的生态和多层次分析。
Eur Respir J. 2019 Sep 19;54(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00596-2019. Print 2019 Sep.
8
Relation between tobacco control policies and population at high risk of lung cancer in the European Union.欧盟控烟政策与肺癌高危人群的关系。
Environ Res. 2019 Dec;179(Pt A):108594. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108594. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
9
Socioeconomic inequalities in the impact of tobacco control policies on adolescent smoking. A multilevel study in 29 European countries.烟草控制政策对青少年吸烟影响中的社会经济不平等:一项对29个欧洲国家的多层次研究。
Addict Behav. 2016 Feb;53:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.09.016. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
10
Tobacco Control and Socioeconomic Inequalities in Adolescent Smoking in Europe.欧洲青少年吸烟中的烟草控制与社会经济不平等
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Nov;49(5):e64-e72. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.032. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a novel e-cigarette regulatory and policy control scale: results from the European Union.制定一种新型电子烟监管与政策控制量表:来自欧盟的结果。
Drugs (Abingdon Engl). 2021 Aug 12;29(6):719-725. doi: 10.1080/09687637.2021.1959520. eCollection 2022.
2
Cigarette Pack Price and Its Within-Person Association With Smoking Initiation, Smoking Progression, and Disparities among Young Adults.卷烟包装价格及其与年轻人吸烟起始、吸烟进展和差异的个体内关联。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Mar 1;24(4):519-528. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab210.
3
Changes in Smoking Behavior Since the Declaration of the COVID-19 State of Emergency in Japan: A Cross-sectional Study From the Osaka Health App.
自日本宣布 COVID-19 紧急状态以来吸烟行为的变化:来自大阪健康应用的横断面研究。
J Epidemiol. 2021 Jun 5;31(6):378-386. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20200533. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
4
Smoking and inequalities in mortality in 11 European countries: a birth cohort analysis.吸烟与 11 个欧洲国家死亡率的不平等:一项出生队列分析。
Popul Health Metr. 2021 Jan 30;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12963-021-00247-2.
5
The Tobacco Control Scale as a research tool to measure country-level tobacco control policy implementation.烟草控制量表作为衡量国家层面烟草控制政策实施情况的研究工具。
Tob Induc Dis. 2020 Nov 3;18:91. doi: 10.18332/tid/128318. eCollection 2020.