Department of Veterans Affairs, William S. Middleton Veterans Memorial Hospital, Madison, WI, USA.
Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2020 Apr;20(3):326-337. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2019.1632937. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
Despite the apparent strength of scientific evidence suggesting that psychological benefits result from both acute and chronic exercise, concerns remain regarding the extent to which these benefits are explained by placebo effects. Addressing these concerns is methodologically and at times conceptually challenging. However, developments in the conceptualisation and study of placebo effects from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, pharmacology, and human performance offer guidance for advancing the understanding of placebo effects in psychological responses to exercise. In clinical trials, expectations can be measured and experimentally manipulated to better understand the influence of placebo effects on treatment responses. Further, compelling evidence has shown that the contribution of placebo effects and their underlying neurobiological mechanisms to treatment effects can be measured without administering a traditional placebo (e.g. inert substance) by leveraging psychological factors such as expectations and conditioning. Hence, the purpose of this focused review is to integrate lessons such as these with the current body of literature on placebo effects in psychological responses to exercise and provide recommendations for future research directions.
尽管有明显的科学证据表明,急性和慢性运动都能带来心理益处,但人们仍然对这些益处在多大程度上可以用安慰剂效应来解释表示关注。解决这些问题在方法学上有时在概念上都具有挑战性。然而,来自心理学、神经科学、药理学和人类表现等领域对安慰剂效应的概念化和研究的发展为深入了解运动对心理反应的安慰剂效应提供了指导。在临床试验中,可以测量和实验性地操纵预期,以更好地了解安慰剂效应对治疗反应的影响。此外,有力的证据表明,可以在不使用传统安慰剂(例如惰性物质)的情况下,通过利用期望和条件作用等心理因素来测量安慰剂效应及其潜在的神经生物学机制对治疗效果的贡献。因此,本次重点综述的目的是将这些经验教训与当前关于运动对心理反应的安慰剂效应的文献相结合,并为未来的研究方向提供建议。