Chung Jon H, Dewal Ninad, Sokol Ethan, Mathew Paul, Whitehead Robert, Millis Sherri Z, Frampton Garrett M, Bratslavsky Gennady, Pal Sumanta K, Lee Richard J, Necchi Andrea, Gregg Jeffrey P, Lara Primo, Antonarakis Emmanuel S, Miller Vincent A, Ross Jeffrey S, Ali Siraj M, Agarwal Neeraj
Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA.
Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019;3. doi: 10.1200/PO.18.00283. Epub 2019 May 10.
Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is increasingly used for routine clinical management of prostate cancer. To inform targeted treatment strategies, 3,476 clinically advanced prostate tumors were analyzed by CGP for genomic alterations (GAs) and signatures of genomic instability.
Prostate cancer samples (1,660 primary site and 1,816 metastatic site tumors from unmatched patients) were prospectively analyzed by CGP (FoundationOne Assay; Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA) for GAs and genomic signatures (genome-wide loss of heterozygosity [gLOH], microsatellite instability [MSI] status, tumor mutational burden [TMB]).
Frequently altered genes were (44%), (32%), (31%), and (23%). Potentially targetable GAs were frequently identified in DNA repair, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and RAS/RAF/MEK pathways. DNA repair pathway GAs included homologous recombination repair (23%), Fanconi anemia (5%), (6%), and mismatch repair (4%) GAs. and GAs were associated with high gLOH, whereas altered tumors were infrequently gLOH high. Median TMB was low (2.6 mutations/Mb). A subset of cases (3%) had high TMB, of which 71% also had high MSI. Metastatic site tumors were enriched for the 11q13 amplicon ( and GAs in and compared with primary tumors.
Routine clinical CGP in the real-world setting identified GAs that are investigational biomarkers for targeted therapies in 57% of cases. gLOH and MSI/TMB signatures could further inform selection of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and immunotherapies, respectively. Correlation of DNA repair GAs with gLOH identified genes associated with homologous recombination repair deficiency. GAs enriched in metastatic site tumors suggest therapeutic strategies for metastatic prostate cancer. Lack of clinical outcome correlation was a limitation of this study.
综合基因组分析(CGP)越来越多地用于前列腺癌的常规临床管理。为了为靶向治疗策略提供依据,对3476例临床晚期前列腺肿瘤进行了CGP分析,以检测基因组改变(GA)和基因组不稳定性特征。
对前列腺癌样本(来自未匹配患者的1660例原发部位肿瘤和1816例转移部位肿瘤)进行前瞻性CGP分析(FoundationOne检测;Foundation Medicine,马萨诸塞州剑桥),以检测GA和基因组特征(全基因组杂合性缺失[gLOH]、微卫星不稳定性[MSI]状态、肿瘤突变负荷[TMB])。
常见的基因改变包括(44%)、(32%)、(31%)和(23%)。在DNA修复、磷脂酰肌醇3激酶和RAS/RAF/MEK途径中经常发现潜在可靶向的GA。DNA修复途径的GA包括同源重组修复(23%)、范可尼贫血(5%)、(6%)和错配修复(4%)GA。和GA与高gLOH相关,而改变的肿瘤很少是高gLOH。中位TMB较低(2.6个突变/Mb)。一部分病例(3%)TMB较高,其中71%也有高MSI。转移部位肿瘤富含11q13扩增子(与原发肿瘤相比,和GA在和中)。
在现实世界环境中进行的常规临床CGP在57%的病例中鉴定出GA,这些GA是靶向治疗的研究性生物标志物。gLOH和MSI/TMB特征可分别进一步指导聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂和免疫疗法的选择。DNA修复GA与gLOH的相关性确定了与同源重组修复缺陷相关的基因。转移部位肿瘤中富集的GA提示了转移性前列腺癌的治疗策略。缺乏临床结局相关性是本研究的一个局限性。