Experimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 20;14(6):e0218404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218404. eCollection 2019.
In an ever-aging society the demand for bone-defect filling grafts continues to gain in importance. While autologous grafting still prevails as the gold standard, allografts and xenografts present viable alternatives with promising results. Physiochemical properties of a graft strongly depend on the processing method such as the decellularization protocol. In addition, the physiochemical characteristics are critical factors for a successful integration of the graft after the implantation and might influence mesenchymal stem cell function in therapeutic approaches combining grafts and autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Several decellularization methods have been proposed, however it still remains unclear which method results in favorable physiochemical properties or might be preferred in stem cell applications. In the first part of this study we compared two decellularization approaches resulting in chemically processed allografts (CPAs) or sonication-based processed allografts (SPAs). Each decellularization approach was compared for its decellularization efficacy and its influence on the grafts' surface texture and composition. In the second part of this study biocompatibility of grafts was assessed by testing the effect of extraction medium on MSC viability and comparing them to commercially available allografts and xenografts. Additionally, grafts' performance in terms of MSC functionality was assessed by reseeding with MSCs pre-differentiated in osteogenic medium and determining cell adhesion, proliferation, as well as alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and the degree of mineralization. In summary, results indicate a more effective decellularization for the SPA approach in comparison to the CPA approach. Even though SPA extracts induced a decrease in MSC viability, MSC performance after reseeding was comparable to commercially available grafts based on DNA quantification, alkaline phosphatase activity and quantification of mineralization. Commercial Tutoplast allografts showed overall the best effects on MSC functionality as indicated by extraction biocompatibility testing as well as by comparing proliferation and osteogenic differentiation.
在老龄化社会中,对骨缺损填充移植物的需求不断增加。虽然自体移植物仍然是金标准,但同种异体移植物和异种移植物作为可行的替代方案具有有前途的结果。移植物的理化性质强烈依赖于处理方法,如脱细胞化方案。此外,理化特性是移植物植入后成功整合的关键因素,并且可能影响治疗方法中结合移植物和自体间充质干细胞 (MSCs) 的间充质干细胞功能。已经提出了几种脱细胞方法,但是仍然不清楚哪种方法导致有利的理化性质或可能在干细胞应用中更受欢迎。在这项研究的第一部分,我们比较了两种脱细胞方法,导致化学处理的同种异体移植物(CPAs)或基于超声处理的同种异体移植物(SPAs)。每种脱细胞方法都比较了其脱细胞效果及其对移植物表面纹理和组成的影响。在这项研究的第二部分,通过测试提取介质对 MSC 活力的影响并将其与商业上可获得的同种异体移植物和异种移植物进行比较,评估了移植物的生物相容性。此外,通过预诱导成骨培养基中的 MSC 再接种,并确定细胞粘附、增殖以及碱性磷酸酶(ALP)活性和矿化程度,评估了移植物在 MSC 功能方面的性能。总之,结果表明 SPA 方法比 CPA 方法的脱细胞效果更有效。尽管 SPA 提取物诱导 MSC 活力下降,但再接种后的 MSC 性能在基于 DNA 定量、碱性磷酸酶活性和矿化程度的商业上可获得的移植物方面是可比的。商业 Tutoplast 同种异体移植物在提取生物相容性测试以及比较增殖和成骨分化方面,整体上对 MSC 功能的影响最好。