Suppr超能文献

捆绑式医院老年生活项目-HELP 和居家护理中的 HELP 及其与出院至家庭医疗保健的老年患者临床结局的关联。

The Bundled Hospital Elder Life Program-HELP and HELP in Home Care-and Its Association With Clinical Outcomes Among Older Adults Discharged to Home Healthcare.

机构信息

Aurora Research Institute, Ed Howe Center for Health Care Transformation, Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

St. Luke's Medical Center, Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Aug;67(8):1730-1736. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15979. Epub 2019 Jun 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the Bundled Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP and HELP in Home Care), an adaptation of HELP, and examine the association of 30-day all-cause unplanned hospital readmission risk among older adults discharged to home care with and without Bundled HELP.

DESIGN

Matched case-control study.

SETTING

Two medical-surgical units within two midwestern rural hospitals and patient homes (home health).

PARTICIPANTS

Hospitalized patients, aged 65 years and older, discharged to home healthcare with and without Bundled HELP exposure between January 1, 2015, and September 30, 2017. Each case (Bundled HELP, n = 148) was matched to a control (non-Bundled HELP, n = 148) on Charlson Comorbidity Index, primary hospital diagnosis of orthopedic condition or injury, and cardiovascular disease using propensity score matching.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary study outcome was 30-day all-cause unplanned hospital readmission. Additional outcomes measured were 30-day emergency department (ED) visit, hospital length of stay (LOS), and total number of skilled home care visits.

RESULTS

Fewer cases (16.8%) than controls (28.4%) had a 30-day all-cause unplanned hospital readmission. The fully adjusted model showed significantly lower risk of 30-day hospital readmission for case (Bundled HELP) patients (0.41; 95% confidence interval = 0.22-0.77; P < .01). The difference between case (10.8%) and control (15.5%) 30-day ED visit was not significant (P = .23). A lower LOS for the case group was shown (P < .01), while the number of skilled home care visits was not significantly different between groups (P = .28).

CONCLUSION

HELP protocol implementation during a patient's hospital stay and as a continued component of home care among older adults at risk for cognitive and/or functional decline appears to be associated with favorable outcomes. Our initial evaluation supports continued study of the Bundled HELP. Further research is needed to confirm the initial findings and to evaluate the impact of the adapted model on functional outcomes and delirium incidence in the home. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1730-1736, 2019.

摘要

目的

描述捆绑式医院老年人生活计划(HELP 和家庭护理中的 HELP),即 HELP 的一种改编形式,并探讨在向家庭护理出院的老年人中,有无捆绑式 HELP 情况下 30 天内全因非计划性再次住院的风险。

设计

匹配病例对照研究。

地点

中西部两家农村医院的两个内科和外科病房以及患者家中(家庭保健)。

参与者

2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 9 月 30 日期间,在出院至家庭保健服务且接受和未接受捆绑式 HELP 治疗的 65 岁及以上住院患者。每个病例(捆绑式 HELP,n=148)均与Charlson 合并症指数、医院骨科疾病或损伤的主要诊断以及心血管疾病方面通过倾向评分匹配与对照(非捆绑式 HELP,n=148)进行匹配。

测量

主要研究结果是 30 天内全因非计划性再次住院。其他测量的结果包括 30 天内急诊就诊、住院时间(LOS)和家庭护理服务的总次数。

结果

与对照组(28.4%)相比,接受捆绑式 HELP 治疗的病例(16.8%)发生 30 天内全因非计划性再次住院的比例更低。经完全调整的模型显示,病例(捆绑式 HELP)患者的 30 天内医院再次入院风险显著降低(0.41;95%置信区间=0.22-0.77;P<.01)。病例组(10.8%)和对照组(15.5%)30 天内急诊就诊的差异无统计学意义(P=0.23)。与对照组相比,病例组的 LOS 较短(P<.01),但两组的家庭护理服务次数无显著差异(P=0.28)。

结论

在认知和/或功能下降风险较高的老年人住院期间以及作为家庭护理的持续组成部分实施 HELP 方案,似乎与良好的结果相关。我们的初步评估支持对捆绑式 HELP 的进一步研究。需要进一步的研究来确认最初的发现,并评估适应性模型对家庭中功能结果和谵妄发生率的影响。美国老年医学会 67:1730-1736, 2019。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验