Wolff Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Health Plan, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jan;67(1):156-163. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15643. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
To compare rates of 30- and 90-day hospital readmissions and observation or emergency department (ED) returns of older adults using the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Health Plan Home Transitions (HT) with those of Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) controls without HT.
Retrospective cohort study.
Analysis of home health and hospital records from 8 UPMC hospitals in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, from July 1, 2015, to April 30, 2017.
HT program participants (n=1,900) and controls (n=1,300).
HT is a care transitions program aimed at preventing readmission that identifies older adults at risk of readmission using a robust inclusion algorithm; deploys a multidisciplinary care team, including a nurse practitioner (NP), a social worker (SW), or both; and provides a multimodal service including personalized care planning, education, treatment, monitoring, and communication facilitation.
We used multivariable logistic regression to determine the effects of HT on the odds of hospital readmission and observation or ED return, controlling for index admission participant characteristics and home health process measures.
The adjusted odds of 30-day readmission was 0.31 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.11-0.87, P = .03) and of 90-day readmission was 0.47 (95% CI=CI = 0.26-0.85, P = .01), for participants at medium risk of readmission in HT who received a team visit. The adjusted odds of 30-day readmission was 0.29 (95% CI = 0.10-0.83, P = .02) for participants at high risk of readmission in HT who received a team visit. The adjusted odds of 30-day observation or ED return was 1.90 (95% CI = 1.28-2.82, P = .001) for participants at medium risk of readmission in HT who received a team visit.
The HT program may be associated with lower odds of 30- and 90-day hospital readmission and counterbalancing higher odds of observation or ED return. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:156-163, 2019.
比较匹兹堡大学医学中心(UPMC)健康计划家庭过渡(HT)组和 Medicare 按服务收费(FFS)对照组中年龄较大患者的 30 天和 90 天住院再入院率和观察或急诊部(ED)返回率。
回顾性队列研究。
宾夕法尼亚州阿勒格尼县 8 家 UPMC 医院的家庭健康和医院记录分析,时间为 2015 年 7 月 1 日至 2017 年 4 月 30 日。
HT 计划参与者(n=1900)和对照组(n=1300)。
HT 是一项旨在预防再入院的护理过渡计划,它使用强大的纳入算法确定有再入院风险的老年人;部署多学科护理团队,包括执业护士(NP)、社会工作者(SW)或两者;并提供包括个性化护理计划、教育、治疗、监测和沟通促进在内的多模式服务。
我们使用多变量逻辑回归来确定 HT 对住院再入院和观察或 ED 返回几率的影响,控制了指数入院患者特征和家庭健康过程测量值。
对于中危再入院的 HT 组参与者,接受团队访问的患者 30 天再入院的调整后几率为 0.31(95%置信区间(CI)=0.11-0.87,P=0.03),90 天再入院的调整后几率为 0.47(95% CI=0.26-0.85,P=0.01)。对于 HT 中高危再入院的患者,接受团队访问的患者 30 天再入院的调整后几率为 0.29(95% CI=0.10-0.83,P=0.02)。对于 HT 中高危再入院的患者,接受团队访问的患者 30 天观察或 ED 返回的调整后几率为 1.90(95% CI=1.28-2.82,P=0.001)。
HT 计划可能与较低的 30 天和 90 天住院再入院几率相关,并平衡较高的观察或 ED 返回几率。美国老年医学会杂志 67:156-163,2019 年。