Centre of Excellence in Frailty-Informed Care, The Perley and Rideau Veterans' Health Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Mar;22(3):544-550.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.020. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
In Canada, alternate-level-of-care (ALC) beds in hospitals may be used when patients who do not require the intensity of services provided in an acute care setting are waiting to be discharged to a more appropriate care setting. However, when there is a lack of care options for patients waiting to be discharged, it contributes to prolonged hospital stays and bottlenecks in the health care system manifested as "hallway medicine." We examined the effectiveness of a function-focused transitional care program, the Sub-Acute care for Frail Elderly (SAFE) Unit, in reducing the length of stay (LOS) in hospital, as well as post-discharge acute care use and continuity of care.
Case-control study.
A 450-bed nursing home located in Ontario, Canada, where the SAFE Unit is based. The study population included frail, older patients aged 60 years and older who received care in the SAFE Unit between March 1, 2018, and February 28, 2019 (n = 153) to controls comprising of other hospitalized patients (n = 1773).
We linked facility-level to provincial health administrative databases on hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) visits, and the Ontario Health Insurance Plan claims database for physician billings to investigated the LOS during the index hospitalization, 30-day odds of post-discharge ED visits, hospital readmission, and follow-up with family physicians.
SAFE patients had a median hospital LOS of 13 days [interquartile range (IQR): 8-19 days], with 75% having fewer than 1 day in an ALC bed. In comparison, the median LOS in the control group was 15 days (IQR: 10-24 days), with one-third of those days spent in an ALC bed (median: 5 days, IQR: 3-10 days). SAFE patients were more likely (64.1%) to be discharged home than control patients (46.3%). Both groups experienced similar 30-day odds of ED visits, hospital readmission and follow-up with a family physician.
Frail older individuals in the SAFE Unit experienced shorter hospital stays, were less likely to be discharged to settings other than home and had similar 30-day acute care outcomes as control patients post-discharge.
在加拿大,当不需要急性护理环境中提供的服务强度的患者等待转至更合适的护理环境时,可以使用医院的替代护理级别(ALC)病床。但是,当等待出院的患者缺乏护理选择时,这会导致住院时间延长,并导致医疗保健系统出现“走廊医学”的瓶颈。我们研究了以功能为重点的过渡性护理计划-虚弱老年人亚急性护理(SAFE)病房,该计划在减少住院时间(LOS)以及出院后急性护理使用和护理连续性方面的有效性。
病例对照研究。
位于加拿大安大略省的一家拥有 450 张床位的养老院,该养老院是 SAFE 病房的所在地。研究人群包括年龄在 60 岁及以上的虚弱,老年人,他们在 2018 年 3 月 1 日至 2019 年 2 月 28 日期间在 SAFE 病房接受护理(n = 153),对照组包括其他住院患者(n = 1773)。
我们将设施级别的省级卫生行政数据库与医院入院和急诊(ED)就诊数据库以及安大略省医疗保险计划的医生账单数据库进行了链接,以调查索引住院期间的 LOS,出院后 30 天的 ED 就诊,医院再入院和与家庭医生的随访情况。
SAFE 患者的中位住院时间为 13 天[四分位距(IQR):8-19 天],其中 75%的患者在 ALC 床上的时间少于 1 天。相比之下,对照组的中位住院时间为 15 天(IQR:10-24 天),其中三分之一的患者在 ALC 床上度过(中位数:5 天,IQR:3-10 天)。与对照组相比,SAFE 患者更有可能(64.1%)出院回家,而对照组患者则为 46.3%。两组患者在出院后 30 天内 ED 就诊,医院再入院和与家庭医生的随访的可能性相似。
SAFE 病房中的虚弱老年人经历了较短的住院时间,不太可能出院至家庭以外的其他地方,并且与对照组患者出院后的 30 天急性护理结局相似。