比较基于理论和非理论的实施方法以改善癌症遗传学中的转诊实践:一项集群随机试验方案。

Comparing theory and non-theory based implementation approaches to improving referral practices in cancer genetics: a cluster randomised trial protocol.

机构信息

Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, NSW, Australia.

University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Trials. 2019 Jun 20;20(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3457-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited, cancer predisposition syndrome associated with an increased risk of colorectal, endometrial and other cancer types. Identifying individuals with LS allows access to cancer risk management strategies proven to reduce cancer incidence and improve survival. However, LS is underdiagnosed and genetic referral rates are poor. Improving LS referral is complex, and requires multisystem behaviour change. Although barriers have been identified, evidence-based strategies to facilitate behaviour change are lacking. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a theory-based implementation approach against a non-theory based approach for improving detection of LS amongst Australian patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

A two-arm parallel cluster randomised trial design will be used to compare two identical, structured implementation approaches, distinguished only by the use of theory to identify barriers and design targeted intervention strategies, to improve LS referral practices in eight large Australian hospital networks. Each hospital network will be randomly allocated to a trial arm, with stratification by state. A trained healthcare professional will lead the following phases at each site: (1) undertake baseline clinical practice audits, (2) form multidisciplinary Implementation Teams, (3) identify target behaviours for practice change, (4) identify barriers to change, (5) generate intervention strategies, (6) support staff to implement interventions and (7) evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention using post-implementation clinical data. The theoretical and non-theoretical components of each trial arm will be distinguished in phases 4-5. Study outcomes include a LS referral process map for each hospital network, with evaluation of the proportion of patients with risk-appropriate completion of the LS referral pathway within 2 months of CRC resection pre and post implementation.

DISCUSSION

This trial will determine the more effective approach for improving the detection of LS amongst patients with CRC, whilst also advancing understanding of the impact of theory-based implementation approaches in complex health systems and the feasibility of training healthcare professionals to use them. Insights gained will guide the development of future interventions to improve LS identification on a larger scale and across different contexts, as well as efforts to address the gap between evidence and practice in the rapidly evolving field of genomic research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ANZCTR, ACTRN12618001072202 . Registered on 27 June 2018.

摘要

背景

林奇综合征(LS)是一种遗传性的、易患癌症的综合征,与结直肠癌、子宫内膜癌和其他癌症类型的风险增加有关。识别出患有 LS 的个体,可以让他们获得已被证明可降低癌症发病率和提高生存率的癌症风险管理策略。然而,LS 的诊断率较低,遗传转诊率也很差。提高 LS 的转诊率很复杂,需要多系统的行为改变。尽管已经确定了障碍,但缺乏促进行为改变的循证策略。本研究旨在比较基于理论的实施方法与非基于理论的方法在提高澳大利亚结直肠癌(CRC)患者中 LS 检出率方面的效果。

方法

采用两臂平行集群随机试验设计,比较两种完全相同的结构化实施方法,唯一的区别在于使用理论来识别障碍并设计有针对性的干预策略,以改善 8 个澳大利亚大型医院网络中的 LS 转诊实践。每个医院网络将被随机分配到一个试验臂中,并按州进行分层。一名经过培训的医疗保健专业人员将在每个站点领导以下阶段:(1)进行基线临床实践审核,(2)组建多学科实施团队,(3)确定实践变更的目标行为,(4)确定变更的障碍,(5)生成干预策略,(6)支持员工实施干预措施,(7)使用实施后的临床数据评估干预措施的效果。每个试验臂的理论和非理论部分将在第 4-5 阶段区分开来。研究结果包括每个医院网络的 LS 转诊流程图,评估在 CRC 切除后 2 个月内,有风险的患者完成 LS 转诊途径的比例,在实施前后进行评估。

讨论

本试验将确定提高 CRC 患者 LS 检出率的更有效方法,同时还将深入了解基于理论的实施方法在复杂卫生系统中的影响,以及培训医疗保健专业人员使用这些方法的可行性。从中获得的见解将指导未来干预措施的制定,以在更大规模和不同环境下提高 LS 的识别率,并努力缩小证据与实践之间的差距,这是在快速发展的基因组研究领域。

试验注册

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心,ACTRN12618001072202。注册于 2018 年 6 月 27 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f0d/6585019/9585891c679b/13063_2019_3457_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索