Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Predoctoral student, Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Feb;123(2):322-329. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.020. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
Whether intraoral digital scanners with an integrated shade-taking function can substitute for colorimeters, spectrophotometers, or the visual method to reduce working time is unclear.
The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the accuracy of the measurement of tooth shade obtained with an intraoral digital scanner in vivo.
Shades of 120 maxillary anterior teeth were evaluated by using a SpectroShade spectrophotometer (SS) and a TRIOS 3 intraoral digital scanner (T3) on 20 participants. The matching of shade readings between the T3 and SS was used to estimate the accuracy of the T3. The percentage of readings when a difference between the shades obtained by both devices was visually perceptible (ΔE>3.7) was calculated. Each of the 120 teeth was measured 5 times to assess repeatability.
The accuracy of the T3 was 53.3% when the color was recorded as a Vita 3D-Master (VM) shade and 27.5% for the Vita Classical (VC) shade guide when the SS was taken as a reference. A visually perceptible color difference was found in 25% (VM) and 50.8% (VC) of situations when the shade was determined with the SS and 48.3% (VM) and 78.3% (VC) with the T3. Repeatability was 92% (VM) and 93.5% (VC) for the SS, and 90.33% (VM) and 87.17% (VC) for the T3.
The findings of this study revealed that the tooth color determined by the T3 does not exactly match that obtained by the SS that additional methods of measuring tooth color are recommended. The accuracy of the T3 was higher when the color was recorded as VM values rather than VC values.
口腔内数字扫描仪是否具有集成的比色功能,可以替代比色计、分光光度计或视觉方法来减少工作时间尚不清楚。
本临床研究的目的是评估在体内使用口腔内数字扫描仪测量牙色的准确性。
在 20 名参与者中,使用 SpectroShade 分光光度计(SS)和 TRIOS 3 口腔内数字扫描仪(T3)评估了 120 颗上颌前牙的颜色。使用 T3 和 SS 之间的比色读数匹配来估计 T3 的准确性。计算当两种设备获得的颜色在视觉上可察觉的差异(ΔE>3.7)时的读数百分比。为了评估重复性,每颗牙齿测量了 5 次。
当 SS 作为参考时,T3 记录为 Vita 3D-Master(VM)色调时,其准确性为 53.3%,记录为 Vita Classical(VC)色调指南时为 27.5%。当使用 SS 确定色调时,在 25%(VM)和 50.8%(VC)的情况下发现了可察觉的颜色差异,而当使用 T3 时,在 48.3%(VM)和 78.3%(VC)的情况下发现了可察觉的颜色差异。SS 的重复性为 92%(VM)和 93.5%(VC),T3 的重复性为 90.33%(VM)和 87.17%(VC)。
本研究结果表明,T3 确定的牙齿颜色与 SS 获得的颜色不完全匹配,建议使用其他牙齿颜色测量方法。当颜色记录为 VM 值而不是 VC 值时,T3 的准确性更高。