• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引入一种程序,客观量化自由执行自主运动期间痉挛运动障碍。

Introduction of a procedure to objectively quantify spastic movement impairment during freely performed voluntary movements.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation & Prevention Engineering, Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Germany.

Department of Rehabilitation & Prevention Engineering, Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Germany.

出版信息

J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2019 Oct;48:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.06.001
PMID:31228684
Abstract

Spastic impaired limb function is a frequent result of brain lesions. Although its assessment is important for clinical and therapeutical management, it still lacks an objective measure to quantify the functionality of the affected limb. The present paper reports a procedure based on the muscular activation recorded by Surface Electromyography (sEMG), which enables the assessment of the degree of spastic impairment. 15 healthy subjects and 7 patients with impaired upper limb function due to spasticity were included in the study. SEMG was recorded from the biceps and brachioradialis during active elbow extension at different movement velocities. The spastic impairment was clinically assessed by the Tardieu-Test and the Wolf Motor Function Test. Results of the clinical assessment and parameter values quantifying the muscular activation at different joint positions and movement velocities have been set in relation to one another. The results show that spastic impairment leads to a changed correlation between the muscular activation and movement velocity as well as to a changed inter-muscular co-ordination of biceps and brachioradialis. These changes, reflected in the sEMG, can be quantified by 5 newly introduced parameters. This way could allow the assessment of spastic impairment in the context of functional everyday tasks, for the first-time.

摘要

痉挛性肢体功能障碍是脑损伤的常见后果。尽管其评估对于临床和治疗管理很重要,但它仍然缺乏一种客观的方法来量化受影响肢体的功能。本文报告了一种基于表面肌电图(sEMG)记录的肌肉激活的方法,该方法可以评估痉挛性损伤的程度。研究纳入了 15 名健康受试者和 7 名因痉挛导致上肢功能障碍的患者。在不同的运动速度下,肱二头肌和肱桡肌的 sEMG 在主动肘伸展时被记录下来。痉挛性损伤通过 Tardieu 测试和 Wolf 运动功能测试进行临床评估。临床评估的结果和量化不同关节位置和运动速度下肌肉激活的参数值相互关联。结果表明,痉挛性损伤导致肌肉激活与运动速度之间的相关性发生改变,以及肱二头肌和肱桡肌之间的肌肉协同作用发生改变。这些变化在 sEMG 中得到反映,可以通过 5 个新引入的参数进行量化。这样就可以首次在功能日常任务的背景下评估痉挛性损伤。

相似文献

1
Introduction of a procedure to objectively quantify spastic movement impairment during freely performed voluntary movements.引入一种程序,客观量化自由执行自主运动期间痉挛运动障碍。
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2019 Oct;48:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
2
Impact of muscle activation on ranges of motion during active elbow movement in children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy.痉挛性偏瘫型脑瘫患儿主动肘关节运动时肌肉激活对活动范围的影响
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2015 Jan;30(1):86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
3
Relationship between stretch reflex thresholds and voluntary arm muscle activation in patients with spasticity.痉挛患者牵张反射阈值与自愿性手臂肌肉激活之间的关系。
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Aug;181(4):579-93. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0956-6. Epub 2007 May 3.
4
Time-frequency coherence of categorized sEMG data during dynamic contractions of biceps, triceps, and brachioradialis as an approach for spasticity detection.分类 sEMG 数据在肱二头肌、肱三头肌和桡侧腕屈肌动态收缩期间的时频相干性作为痉挛检测的一种方法。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019 Mar;57(3):703-713. doi: 10.1007/s11517-018-1911-3. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
5
Stretch reflex adaptation in elbow flexors during repeated passive movements in unilateral brain-injured patients.单侧脑损伤患者在重复被动运动过程中肘屈肌的牵张反射适应性
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Mar;81(3):269-78. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90070-4.
6
Patterns of upper limb muscle activation in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy: Variability and detection of deviations.单侧痉挛型脑瘫患儿上肢肌肉激活模式:变异性与偏差检测
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2018 Nov;59:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
7
Pathological and physiological muscle co-activation during active elbow extension in children with unilateral cerebral palsy.单侧脑瘫患儿主动伸肘时的病理和生理肌肉共同激活
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan;128(1):4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.086. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
8
Spastic co-contraction, rather that spasticity, is associated with impaired active function in adults with acquired brain injury: A pilot study.痉挛性共收缩,而非痉挛,与后天性脑损伤成人主动功能受损相关:一项初步研究。
J Rehabil Med. 2019 Apr 1;51(4):307-311. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2528.
9
Reflex torque response to movement of the spastic elbow: theoretical analyses and implications for quantification of spasticity.痉挛性肘关节运动的反射性扭矩反应:理论分析及其对痉挛量化的意义
Ann Biomed Eng. 1999 Nov-Dec;27(6):815-29. doi: 10.1114/1.234.
10
Incorporating ultrasound-measured musculotendon parameters to subject-specific EMG-driven model to simulate voluntary elbow flexion for persons after stroke.将超声测量的肌肉肌腱参数纳入特定个体的肌电图驱动模型,以模拟中风后患者的主动肘关节屈曲。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2009 Jan;24(1):101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.08.008. Epub 2008 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Technology-assisted assessment of spasticity: a systematic review.技术辅助评估痉挛:系统评价。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Dec 9;19(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01115-2.
2
Electrode Size and Placement for Surface EMG Bipolar Detection from the Brachioradialis Muscle: A Scoping Review.表面肌电双极检测中桡侧腕屈肌的电极大小和放置:范围综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Nov 3;21(21):7322. doi: 10.3390/s21217322.
3
Surface Electromyography Meets Biomechanics: Correct Interpretation of sEMG-Signals in Neuro-Rehabilitation Needs Biomechanical Input.
表面肌电图与生物力学相遇:在神经康复中正确解读表面肌电图信号需要生物力学输入。
Front Neurol. 2020 Dec 3;11:603550. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.603550. eCollection 2020.
4
Surface EMG in Clinical Assessment and Neurorehabilitation: Barriers Limiting Its Use.临床评估与神经康复中的表面肌电图:限制其应用的障碍
Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 2;11:934. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00934. eCollection 2020.