• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of the 1983 Mental Health Act on the management of psychiatric patients.1983年《精神健康法》对精神病患者管理的影响。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Dec 12;295(6612):1529-32. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6612.1529.
2
Legal issues in emergency psychiatry.急诊精神病学中的法律问题。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1983 Jun;6(2):335-45.
3
Mental Health Act 1983: legal responsibility of managers.1983年《精神健康法》:管理人员的法律责任。
Hosp Health Serv Rev. 1987 Jul;83(4):157-61.
4
Changes in the law have improved treatment of the mentally ill.法律的变革改善了对精神病患者的治疗。
Hospitals. 1981 May 1;55(9):61-4.
5
Trends in the Mental Health Act Review Tribunals: a Welsh experience 2004-2008.《精神健康法》审查法庭的趋势:2004 - 2008年威尔士的经验
J Forensic Leg Med. 2009 Oct;16(7):375-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2009.03.002. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
6
Why do so few patients appeal against detention under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act?为什么依据《精神健康法》第2条被拘留的患者中很少有人提出上诉?
BMJ. 1995 Feb 11;310(6976):364-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6976.364.
7
Mental Health Act 1983.1983年《精神健康法》
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 May 28;286(6379):1720-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6379.1720.
8
A suitable case for treatment: should a tribunal discharge a patient if no effective treatment is available?一个适合治疗的案例:如果没有有效的治疗方法,法庭是否应该让患者出院?
New Law J. 1994 Apr 29;144(6645):567-568, 573.
9
Emergency involuntary commitment: a look at the decision-making process.紧急非自愿住院治疗:审视决策过程。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1983 Mar;34(3):249-54. doi: 10.1176/ps.34.3.249.
10
Legislation concerning patients' rights in Israel and in Britain.以色列和英国关于患者权利的立法。
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 1986;23(2):147-56.

引用本文的文献

1
Section 12 approval: fit for purpose?第12节批准:是否适用?
BJPsych Bull. 2020 Jun;44(3):125-126. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2020.39.
2
Predictors of Mental Health Review Tribunal (MHRT) outcome in a forensic inpatient population: a prospective cohort study.法医住院患者群体中心理健康审查法庭(MHRT)结果的预测因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1188-8.
3
Social exclusion and risk of emergency compulsory admission. A case-control study.社会排斥与紧急强制入院风险。一项病例对照研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004 Dec;39(12):1000-9. doi: 10.1007/s00127-004-0836-3.
4
Variation in requests to social services departments for assessment for compulsory psychiatric admission.向社会服务部门提出的强制精神科住院评估申请的差异。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1993 Apr;28(2):71-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00802095.

本文引用的文献

1
Compulsory admissions in a London borough: I. Social and clinical features and a follow-up.伦敦某行政区的强制收治情况:I. 社会与临床特征及随访
Psychol Med. 1981 Aug;11(3):617-36. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700052909.
2
Consent to psychiatric treatment: practical implications of the Mental Health (Amendment) Bill.精神科治疗的同意书:《精神健康(修订)法案》的实际影响
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 May 29;284(6329):1613-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6329.1613.
3
Effect of 1983 mental health legislation on compulsory admissions to a district general hospital.1983年精神卫生立法对一家区综合医院强制收治的影响。
Lancet. 1984 Jul 7;2(8393):44. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)92033-6.
4
Mental Health Act and consent to electroplexy.《精神健康法》与接受电休克治疗的同意书
Br Med J. 1978 Oct 14;2(6144):1083. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6144.1083.
5
'Approved' social worker.“经批准的”社会工作者。
R Soc Health J. 1979 Oct;99(5):216-8. doi: 10.1177/146642407909900511.

1983年《精神健康法》对精神病患者管理的影响。

Effect of the 1983 Mental Health Act on the management of psychiatric patients.

作者信息

Webster L, Dean C, Kessel N

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital of South Manchester, West Didsbury.

出版信息

Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Dec 12;295(6612):1529-32. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6612.1529.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.295.6612.1529
PMID:3122890
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1248674/
Abstract

Two principal objectives of the 1983 Mental Health Act were to decrease the use of emergency orders and to give patients on observation orders the right of appeal. Statistics were collected from the 13 hospitals that admit acute psychiatric patients in the Greater Manchester area, and the figures for 1980-1 were compared with those for 1984-5. Changes in use of the different sections were examined in university units, large psychiatric hospitals, and district general hospital units. The use of emergency orders decreased and the use of treatment orders increased; the use of observation orders remained unchanged. Many more patients exercised their right of appeal in 1984-5, but the number discharged by tribunals remained small. The nurses' holding power was used infrequently. The different types of hospital are now more concordant in their use of these orders than before the 1983 act.

摘要

1983年《精神健康法》的两个主要目标是减少紧急命令的使用,并赋予接受观察命令的患者上诉权。从大曼彻斯特地区收治急性精神病患者的13家医院收集了统计数据,并将1980 - 1年的数据与1984 - 5年的数据进行了比较。在大学附属医院、大型精神病医院和地区综合医院对不同条款的使用变化进行了研究。紧急命令的使用减少,治疗命令的使用增加;观察命令的使用保持不变。在1984 - 5年,更多患者行使了上诉权,但由法庭批准出院的人数仍然很少。护士的拘留权很少被使用。与1983年该法案实施前相比,不同类型的医院在这些命令的使用上现在更加一致。