• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弥合生态系统服务供应者和受益者之间的城乡差距:利用分布式社区苗圃支持农村再造林。

Bridging the Urban-Rural Divide Between Ecosystem Service Suppliers and Beneficiaries: Using a Distributed Community Nursery to Support Rural Revegetation.

机构信息

O'Connor NRM Pty Ltd, PO Box 265, Stepney, SA, 5069, Australia.

Centre for Global Food and Resources, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2019 Aug;64(2):166-177. doi: 10.1007/s00267-019-01179-2. Epub 2019 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-019-01179-2
PMID:31230102
Abstract

The provision of ecosystem services from vegetation on private land is constrained by a lack of effective markets to overcome the costs of supply. Urban beneficiaries of ecosystem services from vegetation on private, rural land have limited options for enhancing the supply. This study examines a not-for-profit revegetation programme, the Tree Scheme, in which participants are volunteers who grow seedlings for revegetation on rural land, and rural landholders who use the seedlings in revegetation. We used records of participation and seedlings, along with participant questionnaires to investigate the flow of resources between volunteer growers and rural landholders. The programme produced approximately 22.5 million seedlings between 1994 and 2012; 79% of seedlings were grown in urban locations and 79% of seedlings were ordered for rural plantings. Landholders identified a mixture of objectives for revegetation, with improvement of habitat and biodiversity being most common, followed by objectives with higher private benefits, including planting for windbreaks, erosion control and screening. Volunteer growers reported liking the programme because of the programme's intended environmental benefits, the satisfaction they gained from raising seedlings and other social benefits of participation. The programme demonstrates that a substantial flow of resources between urban ecosystem services beneficiaries and rural producers can be achieved by facilitating voluntary actions. The type and scale of this programme is rare and potentially transferable.

摘要

植被的生态系统服务在私人土地上的供应受到缺乏有效市场的限制,无法克服供应成本。私人农村土地上植被的生态系统服务的城市受益者在增加供应方面选择有限。本研究考察了一个非营利性的重新造林计划,即 Tree Scheme,参与者是在农村土地上种植幼苗进行重新造林的志愿者,以及在重新造林中使用幼苗的农村土地所有者。我们使用参与和幼苗记录以及参与者问卷来调查志愿者种植者和农村土地所有者之间资源的流动情况。该计划在 1994 年至 2012 年间生产了约 2250 万株幼苗;79%的幼苗在城市地区种植,79%的幼苗是为农村种植而订购的。土地所有者确定了重新造林的目标组合,其中改善生境和生物多样性最为常见,其次是具有更高私人利益的目标,包括防风林、控制侵蚀和屏蔽的种植。志愿者种植者报告说喜欢该计划,因为该计划有预期的环境效益,他们从种植幼苗中获得的满足感以及参与的其他社会效益。该计划表明,可以通过促进自愿行动,在城市生态系统服务受益者和农村生产者之间实现大量资源的流动。这种类型和规模的计划很少见,具有潜在的可转移性。

相似文献

1
Bridging the Urban-Rural Divide Between Ecosystem Service Suppliers and Beneficiaries: Using a Distributed Community Nursery to Support Rural Revegetation.弥合生态系统服务供应者和受益者之间的城乡差距:利用分布式社区苗圃支持农村再造林。
Environ Manage. 2019 Aug;64(2):166-177. doi: 10.1007/s00267-019-01179-2. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
2
Revegetation in agricultural areas: the development of structural complexity and floristic diversity.农业地区的植被恢复:结构复杂性和植物多样性的发展
Ecol Appl. 2009 Jul;19(5):1197-210. doi: 10.1890/08-0939.1.
3
Environmental Management in the Peri-urban Region: Psychological and Contextual Factors Influencing Private Land Conservation Actions.城乡交错带的环境管理:影响私人土地保护行为的心理和情境因素。
Environ Manage. 2021 Aug;68(2):184-197. doi: 10.1007/s00267-021-01487-6. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
4
Where and when to revegetate: a quantitative method for scheduling landscape reconstruction.在何处以及何时进行植被恢复:一种用于规划景观重建的定量方法。
Ecol Appl. 2009 Jun;19(4):817-28. doi: 10.1890/08-0915.1.
5
A decision support process to compare riparian revegetation options in Scheu Creek catchment in north Queensland.一种用于比较昆士兰州北部舍乌溪流域河岸植被恢复方案的决策支持过程。
J Environ Manage. 2001 May;62(1):101-12. doi: 10.1006/jema.2001.0422.
6
Ecosystem services: Urban parks under a magnifying glass.生态系统服务:城市公园放大镜下的观察。
Environ Res. 2018 Jan;160:469-478. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.023. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
7
A landholder-based approach to the design of private-land conservation programs.基于土地所有者的私人土地保护规划设计方法。
Conserv Biol. 2011 Jun;25(3):493-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01639.x. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
8
The influence of planting size and configuration on landscape fire risk.种植规模和配置对景观火灾风险的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Oct 15;248:109338. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109338. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
9
Optimising UK urban road verge contributions to biodiversity and ecosystem services with cost-effective management.用具有成本效益的管理方式优化英国城市道路边缘对生物多样性和生态系统服务的贡献。
J Environ Manage. 2017 Apr 15;191:162-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.062. Epub 2017 Jan 14.
10
Current carbon prices do not stack up to much land use change, despite bundled ecosystem service co-benefits.目前的碳价格并不能带来太多土地利用变化,尽管捆绑了生态系统服务的共同效益。
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Jun;27(12):2744-2762. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15613. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
"Eco-caring together" pro-ecological group-based community interventions and mental wellbeing: a systematic scoping review.“共同关爱生态”基于生态关怀团体的社区干预与心理健康:一项系统综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 24;15:1288791. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1288791. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Patterns in the Implementation of Payments for Environmental Services.全球环境服务付费实施模式
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 3;11(3):e0149847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149847. eCollection 2016.
2
Reforestation with native mixed-species plantings in a temperate continental climate effectively sequesters and stabilizes carbon within decades.在温带大陆性气候条件下,采用乡土混合种源造林可以在几十年内有效地固定和稳定碳。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Apr;21(4):1552-66. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12746. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
3
Are incentive programs working? Landowner attitudes to ecological restoration of agricultural landscapes.
激励计划是否有效?土地所有者对农业景观生态恢复的态度。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Sep 30;127:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.034. Epub 2013 May 15.
4
Planetary stewardship in an urbanizing world: beyond city limits.在城市化世界中进行行星守护:超越城市界限。
Ambio. 2012 Dec;41(8):787-94. doi: 10.1007/s13280-012-0353-7. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
5
Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns?景观对作物授粉服务的影响:是否存在普遍模式?
Ecol Lett. 2008 May;11(5):499-515. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01157.x. Epub 2008 Feb 18.
6
Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: towards a new paradigm of 'ecoagriculture' landscapes.生物多样性保护与农业可持续性:迈向“生态农业”景观的新范式。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 12;363(1491):477-94. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2165.
7
Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture.农业中用于保护节肢动物害虫天敌的栖息地管理。
Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:175-201. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.175.