Suppr超能文献

艾滋病治疗差异化服务提供的回顾:有效性、机制、目标人群和规模。

A Review of Differentiated Service Delivery for HIV Treatment: Effectiveness, Mechanisms, Targeting, and Scale.

机构信息

Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases, and Global Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, 995 Potrero Avenue, Bldg 80, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA.

Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

出版信息

Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2019 Aug;16(4):324-334. doi: 10.1007/s11904-019-00454-5.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Differentiated service delivery (DSD) models were initially developed as a means to combat suboptimal long-term retention in HIV care, and to better titrate limited health systems resources to patient needs, primarily in low-income countries. The models themselves are designed to streamline care along the HIV care cascade and range from individual to group-based care and facility to community-based health delivery systems. However, much remains to be understood about how well and for whom DSD models work and whether these models can be scaled, are sustainable, and can reach vulnerable and high-risk populations. Implementation science is tasked with addressing some of these questions through systematic, scientific inquiry. We review the available published evidence on the implementation of DSD and suggest further health systems innovations needed to maximize the public health impact of DSD and future implementation science research directions in this expanding field.

RECENT FINDINGS

While early observational data supported the effectiveness of various DSD models, more recently published trials as well as evaluations of national scale-up provide more rigorous evidence for effectiveness and performance at scale. Deeper understanding of the mechanism of effect of various DSD models and generalizability of studies to other countries or contexts remains somewhat limited. Relative implementability of DSD models may differ based on patient preference, logistical complexity of model adoption and maintenance, human resource and pharmacy supply chain needs, and comparative cost-effectiveness. However, few studies to date have evaluated comparative implementation or cost-effectiveness from a health systems perspective. While DSD represents an exciting and promising "next step" in HIV health care delivery, this innovation comes with its own set of implementation challenges. Evidence on the effectiveness of DSD generally supports the use of most DSD models, although it is still unclear which models are most relevant in diverse settings and populations and which are the most cost-effective. Challenges during scale-up highlight the need for accurate differentiation of patients, sustainable inclusion of a new cadre of health care worker (the community health care worker), and substantial strengthening of existing pharmacy supply chains. To maximize the public health impact of DSD, systems need to be patient-centered and adaptive, as well as employ robust quality improvement processes.

摘要

目的综述

差异化服务提供(DSD)模式最初是作为一种手段开发的,旨在解决艾滋病毒护理中长期保留率不理想的问题,并更好地根据患者的需求调整有限的卫生系统资源,主要是在低收入国家。这些模式旨在简化艾滋病毒护理级联中的护理工作,从个体护理到群体护理,再到以医疗机构为基础的卫生服务系统。然而,人们对 DSD 模式的效果及其适用性,以及这些模式是否可以扩展、可持续以及能否覆盖弱势群体和高危人群,还有很多需要了解。实施科学的任务是通过系统的科学研究来解决这些问题中的一些问题。我们回顾了关于 DSD 实施的现有发表证据,并就如何最大限度地发挥 DSD 的公共卫生影响以及在这一不断扩大的领域中未来实施科学研究方向提出了进一步的卫生系统创新建议。

最新发现

虽然早期的观察性数据支持了各种 DSD 模式的有效性,但最近发表的试验以及对国家范围扩大的评估提供了更严格的证据,证明了在扩大规模方面的有效性和表现。对各种 DSD 模式的作用机制和研究结果在其他国家或环境中的推广性的理解仍然有些有限。基于患者偏好、模型采用和维持的后勤复杂性、人力资源和药房供应链需求以及相对成本效益,DSD 模型的相对可实施性可能有所不同。然而,迄今为止,很少有研究从卫生系统角度评估比较实施或成本效益。虽然 DSD 代表了艾滋病毒医疗保健提供方面的一个令人兴奋和有前途的“下一步”,但这种创新带来了其自身的一系列实施挑战。关于 DSD 有效性的证据普遍支持使用大多数 DSD 模式,尽管仍然不清楚在不同环境和人群中哪些模式最相关,以及哪些模式最具成本效益。扩大规模过程中的挑战突出表明,需要准确区分患者,可持续地纳入新的卫生保健工作者(社区卫生保健工作者),并大幅加强现有的药房供应链。为了最大限度地发挥 DSD 的公共卫生影响,系统需要以患者为中心并具有适应性,同时还需要采用稳健的质量改进流程。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验