Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, England.
DAI (formerly Health Partners International), Cape Town, South Africa.
Global Health. 2018 Apr 25;14(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0351-z.
In 2011, a decision was made to scale up a pilot innovation involving 'adherence clubs' as a form of differentiated care for HIV positive people in the public sector antiretroviral therapy programme in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. In 2016 we were involved in the qualitative aspect of an evaluation of the adherence club model, the overall objective of which was to assess the health outcomes for patients accessing clubs through epidemiological analysis, and to conduct a health systems analysis to evaluate how the model of care performed at scale. In this paper we adopt a complex adaptive systems lens to analyse planned organisational change through intervention in a state health system. We explore the challenges associated with taking to scale a pilot that began as a relatively simple innovation by a non-governmental organisation.
Our analysis reveals how a programme initially representing a simple, unitary system in terms of management and clinical governance had evolved into a complex, differentiated care system. An innovation that was assessed as an excellent idea and received political backing, worked well whilst supported on a small scale. However, as scaling up progressed, challenges have emerged at the same time as support has waned. We identified a 'tipping point' at which the system was more likely to fail, as vulnerabilities magnified and the capacity for adaptation was exceeded. Yet the study also revealed the impressive capacity that a health system can have for catalysing novel approaches.
We argue that innovation in largescale, complex programmes in health systems is a continuous process that requires ongoing support and attention to new innovation as challenges emerge. Rapid scaling up is also likely to require recourse to further resources, and a culture of iterative learning to address emerging challenges and mitigate complex system errors. These are necessary steps to the future success of adherence clubs as a cornerstone of differentiated care. Further research is needed to assess the equity and quality outcomes of a differentiated care model and to ensure the inclusive distribution of the benefits to all categories of people living with HIV.
2011 年,决定扩大一项试点创新,即在南非西开普省公共部门抗逆转录病毒治疗方案中,将“依从俱乐部”作为一种差异化护理形式,用于艾滋病毒阳性人群。2016 年,我们参与了对依从俱乐部模式的定性评估,该评估的总体目标是通过流行病学分析评估接受俱乐部服务的患者的健康结果,并进行卫生系统分析,以评估该护理模式在扩大规模时的表现。在本文中,我们采用复杂适应系统的视角来分析通过干预国家卫生系统进行的有计划的组织变革。我们探讨了将一个最初由非政府组织发起的相对简单的创新推广到更大规模所面临的挑战。
我们的分析揭示了一个项目如何从管理和临床治理方面最初代表一个简单、单一系统,演变成一个复杂的差异化护理系统。一项被评估为优秀理念并得到政治支持的创新,在小规模支持下运作良好。然而,随着规模的扩大,挑战也随之出现,同时支持也减弱了。我们发现了一个“临界点”,在这个点上,系统更有可能失败,因为脆弱性加剧,适应能力超过了。然而,研究还揭示了卫生系统在催化新方法方面所具有的令人印象深刻的能力。
我们认为,卫生系统中大规模、复杂项目的创新是一个持续的过程,需要持续的支持和关注新的创新,以应对出现的挑战。快速扩大规模也可能需要更多的资源,并需要迭代学习的文化,以应对新出现的挑战并减轻复杂系统的错误。这些是使依从俱乐部成为差异化护理基石的未来成功的必要步骤。需要进一步研究,以评估差异化护理模式的公平性和质量结果,并确保所有艾滋病毒感染者都能公平地享受到该模式的好处。