• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

没有足够的时间做出治疗决策会影响癌症患者的治疗体验:一项横断面研究的结果。

Not having adequate time to make a treatment decision can impact on cancer patients' care experience: Results of a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Callaghan, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Callaghan, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Nov;102(11):1957-1960. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.011
PMID:31230873
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We examined whether patients reporting not having adequate time to make a treatment decision is associated with discordance between their preferred and perceived involvement in decision making.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study involving Australian outpatients attending five medical or radiation oncology units. Logistic regression modelling was conducted.

RESULTS

Four hundred twenty-three patients participated. Patients who reported not having adequate time to make their last important treatment decision had significantly higher odds of experiencing discordance between their preferred and perceived involvement in this decision, compared to those patients who reported having adequate time (OR: 2.76; 95% CI: 1.01-7.55; p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Patients should receive adequate time when making cancer treatment decisions. This may help patients "digest" and use the information they received, and become involved in decision making, to the extent they desire. Future research should further investigate what patients consider adequate time for decision making.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Doctors should assess patients' preferences for the amount of time they prefer when making a treatment decision and tailor care accordingly. Offering patients two consultations with some time to think about their options in-between these consultations may be one method in achieving this.

摘要

目的

我们研究了患者报告没有足够的时间做出治疗决策是否与他们在决策中的偏好和感知参与程度不一致有关。

方法

这是一项涉及澳大利亚五家医学或放射肿瘤学单位门诊患者的横断面研究的二次分析。采用逻辑回归模型进行分析。

结果

共有 423 名患者参与了研究。与报告有足够时间做出最后一个重要治疗决策的患者相比,报告没有足够时间做出决策的患者在做出这个决策时的偏好和感知参与程度之间存在明显更高的不一致的可能性(OR:2.76;95%CI:1.01-7.55;p=0.048)。

结论

患者在做出癌症治疗决策时应获得足够的时间。这可能有助于患者“消化”和使用他们所收到的信息,并根据自己的意愿参与决策。未来的研究应该进一步探讨患者认为做出决策需要多少时间。

实践意义

医生应该评估患者对做出治疗决策时所需时间的偏好,并相应地调整护理措施。为患者提供两次咨询,并在两次咨询之间留出一些时间来考虑他们的选择,这可能是实现这一目标的一种方法。

相似文献

1
Not having adequate time to make a treatment decision can impact on cancer patients' care experience: Results of a cross-sectional study.没有足够的时间做出治疗决策会影响癌症患者的治疗体验:一项横断面研究的结果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Nov;102(11):1957-1960. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
2
Not asking cancer patients about their preferences does make a difference. A cross-sectional study examining cancer patients' preferred and perceived role in decision-making regarding their last important cancer treatment.不询问癌症患者的偏好确实会产生影响。一项横断面研究调查了癌症患者在其最后一次重要癌症治疗决策中偏好的和感知到的角色。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Sep;27(5):e12871. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12871. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
3
A discrete choice experiment to assess cancer patients' preferences for when and how to make treatment decisions.一项离散选择实验,用于评估癌症患者对何时以及如何做出治疗决策的偏好。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Apr;26(4):1215-1220. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3944-9. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
4
Perceived problems with involvement in decision making about breast cancer treatment and care: A cross-sectional study.参与乳腺癌治疗和护理决策中感知到的问题:一项横断面研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Mar;104(3):505-511. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.044. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
5
Patient involvement in decision-making: a cross-sectional study in a Malaysian primary care clinic.患者参与决策:马来西亚一家初级保健诊所的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 4;6(1):e010063. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010063.
6
Discordance Between Advanced Cancer Patients' Perceived and Preferred Roles in Decision Making and its Association with Psychological Distress and Perceived Quality of Care.晚期癌症患者在决策中感知到的和偏好的角色之间的不匹配及其与心理困扰和感知到的护理质量的关系。
Patient. 2021 Sep;14(5):581-589. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00480-1. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
7
Patient Preferred and Perceived Control in Dental Care Decision Making.牙科护理决策中患者的偏好与感知控制
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2019 Apr;4(2):151-159. doi: 10.1177/2380084418811321. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
8
Veterans' decision-making preferences and perceived involvement in care for chronic heart failure.退伍军人对慢性心力衰竭护理的决策偏好及感知参与度
Heart Lung. 2008 Nov-Dec;37(6):440-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
9
Treatment decision making experiences of migrant cancer patients and their families in Australia.澳大利亚移民癌症患者及其家庭的治疗决策经历。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jun;98(6):742-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
10
How well are we meeting haematological cancer survivors' preferences for involvement in treatment decision making?我们在多大程度上满足血液癌症幸存者参与治疗决策的偏好?
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jul;88(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.12.014. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
The focus on life-prolonging anticancer treatment hampers shared decision-making in people with advanced cancer: A qualitative embedded multiple-case study.对延长生命的抗癌治疗的关注阻碍了晚期癌症患者的共同决策:一项定性嵌入式多案例研究。
Palliat Med. 2024 Dec;38(10):1156-1168. doi: 10.1177/02692163241281145. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
2
Improving sustainability of a patient decision aid for systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A qualitative study.提高转移性结直肠癌全身治疗患者决策辅助工具的可持续性:一项定性研究。
PEC Innov. 2024 Jun 7;4:100300. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100300. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Towards a novel approach guiding the decision-making process for anticancer treatment in patients with advanced cancer: framework for systemic anticancer treatment with palliative intent.
一种指导晚期癌症患者抗癌治疗决策过程的新方法:以姑息为目的的全身性抗癌治疗框架。
ESMO Open. 2022 Jun;7(3):100496. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100496. Epub 2022 May 18.
4
Decision-making about mastectomy among Chinese women with breast cancer: a mixed-methods study protocol.决策关于乳腺癌中国女性乳房切除术:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 20;12(4):e054685. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054685.
5
How to Train Your Health: Sports as a Resource to Improve Cognitive Abilities in Cancer Patients.如何锻炼你的健康:将运动作为提高癌症患者认知能力的一种资源
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 13;10:2096. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02096. eCollection 2019.