Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research and Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, Singapore.
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Patient. 2021 Sep;14(5):581-589. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00480-1. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
We investigated patient-reported roles of families, physicians, and patients themselves in treatment decision making and whether discordance between perceived and preferred roles is associated with psychological distress and perceived quality of care among patients with cancer.
We analyzed cross-sectional survey data from 599 adults with stage IV solid malignancy in Singapore. Stuart-Maxwell tests were used to compare patients' perceived and preferred roles in decision making. Types of discordance were categorized as follows: involvement at a lesser level than preferred, involvement at a greater level than preferred, and no change in patient involvement. Ordinary least squares regressions examined the associations between types of discordance and patient outcomes, controlling for patient characteristics.
Discordance between perceived and preferred roles was observed in 16% of patients. Amongst patients with discordance, 33% reported being involved at a lesser level than they preferred, 47% reported being involved at a greater level than they preferred, and 19% reported discordance where level of patient involvement did not change. Multivariable analyses showed that lesser involvement than preferred and discordance with no change in patient involvement were associated with poorer quality of physician communication (β = - 9.478 [95% confidence interval {CI} - 16.303 to - 2.653] and β = - 9.184 [95% CI - 18.066 to - 0.301]) and poorer care coordination (β = - 11.658 [95% CI - 17.718 to - 5.597] and β = - 8.856 [95% CI - 16.744 to - 0.968]) compared with concordance.
Most patients reported participating at their desired level. Despite this finding, our results suggest that involving patients at a lesser level than they prefer can lead to poorer perceived quality of physician communication and care coordination and that encouraging patient participation is a safe approach to minimizing poor outcomes.
我们调查了家庭、医生和患者自身在治疗决策中的角色,以及患者感知到的角色和期望的角色之间的不匹配是否与癌症患者的心理困扰和感知到的护理质量有关。
我们分析了来自新加坡 599 名患有晚期实体恶性肿瘤的成年人的横断面调查数据。斯图尔特-马克斯韦尔检验用于比较患者在决策中的感知角色和期望角色。不匹配的类型分为以下几类:参与度低于期望、参与度高于期望、患者参与度不变。普通最小二乘法回归控制患者特征后,检验了不匹配类型与患者结果之间的关系。
在 16%的患者中观察到感知角色和期望角色之间的不匹配。在存在不匹配的患者中,33%的患者报告参与度低于期望,47%的患者报告参与度高于期望,19%的患者报告患者参与度不变。多变量分析显示,参与度低于期望和患者参与度不变的不匹配与较差的医生沟通质量(β= - 9.478[95%置信区间(CI)- 16.303 至 - 2.653]和β= - 9.184[95%CI - 18.066 至 - 0.301])和较差的护理协调(β= - 11.658[95%CI - 17.718 至 - 5.597]和β= - 8.856[95%CI - 16.744 至 - 0.968])相关,与一致性相比。
大多数患者报告参与了他们期望的水平。尽管有这一发现,但我们的结果表明,让患者的参与度低于他们的期望可能会导致较差的医生沟通和护理协调感知质量,而鼓励患者参与是一种降低不良结果风险的安全方法。