Suppr超能文献

处方争议:关于发热儿童联合/交替使用布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚的最新综述与荟萃分析

Prescribing Controversies: An Updated Review and Meta-Analysis on Combined/Alternating Use of Ibuprofen and Paracetamol in Febrile Children.

作者信息

Trippella Giulia, Ciarcià Martina, de Martino Maurizio, Chiappini Elena

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Post-Graduate School of Pediatrics, Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2019 Jun 5;7:217. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00217. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Ibuprofen and paracetamol are the only antipyretics recommended in febrile children. According to international guidelines the choice of the drug should rely on the child's individual characteristics, while a controversial issue regards the combined or alternate use of the two drugs. To compare the efficacy and safety of combined or alternating use of ibuprofen and paracetamol in children. A systematic review of literature was performed on Medline and Embase databases. The included studies were randomized controlled trials analyzing the efficacy of combined or alternating therapy with antipyretics in febrile children vs. monotherapy. A meta-analysis was performed to measure the effect of treatment on child's temperature and discomfort. Adverse effects were analyzed as secondary outcome. Nine studies were included, involving 2,026 children. Mean temperature was lower in the combined therapy group at 1 h (mean difference: -0.29°C; 95%CI: -0.45 to -0.13) after the initial administration of therapy. No statistical difference was found in mean temperature at 4 and 6 h from baseline. A significant difference was found in the proportion of children reaching apyrexia at 4 and 6 h with the combined treatment (RR: 0.18, 95%CI: 0.06 to 0.53, and 0.10, 95%CI: 0.01-0.71, respectively) and at 6 h with alternating treatment (RR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.15-0.57), compared to children treated with monotherapy. The child's discomfort score was slightly lower with alternating therapy vs. monotherapy. The pooled mean difference in the number of medication doses per child used during the first 24 h was not significantly different among groups. Combined or alternating therapy resulted more effective than monotherapy in reducing body temperature. However, the benefit appeared modest and probably not clinically relevant. The effect on child discomfort and number of doses of medication was modest as well. According to our findings, evidences are not robust enough to encourage combined or alternating paracetamol and ibuprofen instead of monotherapy to treat febrile children, reinforcing the current recommendation of most of the international guidelines.

摘要

布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚是发热儿童唯一推荐使用的退烧药。根据国际指南,药物的选择应依据儿童的个体特征,而关于这两种药物联合使用或交替使用存在争议。为比较布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚联合使用或交替使用在儿童中的疗效和安全性。对Medline和Embase数据库进行了文献系统综述。纳入的研究为随机对照试验,分析了退烧药联合或交替治疗发热儿童与单一疗法的疗效。进行荟萃分析以衡量治疗对儿童体温和不适的影响。将不良反应作为次要结果进行分析。纳入了9项研究,涉及2026名儿童。联合治疗组在首次给药后1小时的平均体温较低(平均差值:-0.29°C;95%置信区间:-0.45至-0.13)。从基线起4小时和6小时的平均体温未发现统计学差异。联合治疗在4小时和6小时达到无热的儿童比例(分别为RR:0.18,95%置信区间:0.06至0.53,以及0.10,95%置信区间:0.01 - 0.71)以及交替治疗在6小时达到无热的儿童比例(RR:0.30,95%置信区间:0.15 - 0.57)与单一疗法治疗的儿童相比有显著差异。交替疗法与单一疗法相比,儿童的不适评分略低。每组在前24小时内每个儿童使用的药物剂量总数的合并平均差值无显著差异。联合或交替治疗在降低体温方面比单一疗法更有效。然而,这种益处似乎不大,可能在临床上也不相关。对儿童不适和药物剂量的影响也不大。根据我们的研究结果,证据不够充分,不足以鼓励用对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬联合或交替使用替代单一疗法来治疗发热儿童,并强化了大多数国际指南的当前建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1408/6560148/0bfb548902d3/fped-07-00217-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验