• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第二代基础胰岛素类似物在2型糖尿病中的疗效与安全性:一项批判性评估。

Efficacy and safety of the second generation basal insulin analogs in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A critical appraisal.

作者信息

Hernando Vargas-Uricoechea, Pablo Frias Juan

机构信息

Director of the Metabolic Diseases Study Group, Associate Professor of the Department of Internal Medicine, Universidad Del Cauca, Carrera 5 # 13N-36, Popayán, Cauca, Colombia.

National Research Institute, 2010 Wilshire Blvd # 302, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 May-Jun;13(3):2126-2141. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.dsx.2019.05.001
PMID:31235147
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a progressive disease, which requires insulin treatment when other management is no longer effective. Although, insulin plays a vital role in the treatment of diabetes, conventional basal insulins have certain limitations, which have led to the development of more stable and peak less analogues.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the efficacy and safety of second generation vs. first generation basal insulins, and the efficacy and safety of second generation vs. second generation basal insulins, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, from the evidence provided by head-to-head randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

The following electronic databases were searched: PubMed and MEDLINE, Scopus, BIOSIS, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, and Springer Online Archives Collection, from January 1966 to October 2018. Articles resulting from these searches and relevant references cited in those articles were examined.

RESULTS

The efficacy among insulins evaluated was similar, however, second generation insulins cause a lower risk of hypoglycemia compared to first generation insulins. A single study showed similar metabolic control with subtle differences in the risk of hypoglycemia among second generation insulins.

CONCLUSIONS

The second-generation basal insulins result in metabolic control similar to first generation insulins, with lower risk of hypoglycemia. Second-generation insulins have comparable efficacy, with some differences in the risk of hypoglycemia.

摘要

未标注

2型糖尿病是一种进行性疾病,当其他治疗方法不再有效时需要胰岛素治疗。尽管胰岛素在糖尿病治疗中起着至关重要的作用,但传统的基础胰岛素有一定局限性,这促使了更稳定、峰效应更低的类似物的研发。

目的

根据头对头随机对照试验提供的证据,分析第二代与第一代基础胰岛素在2型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性,以及第二代与第二代基础胰岛素之间的疗效和安全性。

方法

检索了以下电子数据库:1966年1月至2018年10月期间的PubMed和MEDLINE、Scopus、BIOSIS、Embase、ClinicalTrials.gov、谷歌学术和施普林格在线档案库。对这些检索结果以及这些文章中引用的相关参考文献进行了审查。

结果

所评估的胰岛素之间疗效相似,然而,与第一代胰岛素相比,第二代胰岛素导致低血糖的风险更低。一项研究显示,第二代胰岛素在代谢控制方面相似,但在低血糖风险方面存在细微差异。

结论

第二代基础胰岛素导致的代谢控制与第一代胰岛素相似,但低血糖风险更低。第二代胰岛素具有相当的疗效,在低血糖风险方面存在一些差异。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of the second generation basal insulin analogs in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A critical appraisal.第二代基础胰岛素类似物在2型糖尿病中的疗效与安全性:一项批判性评估。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 May-Jun;13(3):2126-2141. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 12.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of basal insulins: A review.基础胰岛素的比较疗效和安全性:综述。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021 Nov-Dec;15(6):102318. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.102318. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
3
Twenty Years of Insulin Gla-100: A Systematic Evaluation of Its Efficacy and Safety in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.甘精胰岛素U100二十年:对其在2型糖尿病中疗效和安全性的系统评价
Diabetes Ther. 2022 Aug;13(8):1409-1481. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01284-2. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
4
Understanding concentrated insulins: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.了解浓缩胰岛素:随机对照试验的系统评价
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Jun;34(6):1029-1043. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1409426. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
5
Insulin glargine: a systematic review of a long-acting insulin analogue.甘精胰岛素:长效胰岛素类似物的系统评价
Clin Ther. 2003 Jun;25(6):1541-77, discussion 1539-40. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80156-x.
6
Are newer insulins always the better option?新型胰岛素是否总是更好的选择?
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2019 Apr;26(2):77-83. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000469.
7
Efficacy and safety of the second generation basal insulin analogs in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A critical appraisal.第二代基础胰岛素类似物在2型糖尿病中的疗效与安全性:一项批判性评估
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 May-Jun;13(3):1975-1989. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2019.04.014. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
8
Basal insulins: Pharmacological properties and patient perspectives.基础胰岛素:药理学特性和患者视角。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2010 Apr;4 Suppl 1:S19-23. doi: 10.1016/S1751-9918(10)60005-8.
9
Understanding how pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences of basal analog insulins influence clinical practice.了解基础胰岛素类似物的药代动力学和药效学差异如何影响临床实践。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Oct;33(10):1821-1831. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1335192. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
10
Biphasic insulin aspart 30: literature review of adverse events associated with treatment.双时相门冬胰岛素30:与治疗相关不良事件的文献综述
Clin Ther. 2005;27 Suppl B:S75-88. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.11.022.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes With Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100 in Insulin-Naïve and Previously Insulin-Treated Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.在既往未使用胰岛素和既往接受胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,每周一次胰岛素icodec与每日一次甘精胰岛素U100的临床结局比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2024 May;7(3):e00480. doi: 10.1002/edm2.480.
2
Current Insights on the Use of Insulin and the Potential Use of Insulin Mimetics in Targeting Insulin Signalling in Alzheimer's Disease.当前关于胰岛素使用的新见解以及胰岛素类似物在靶向阿尔茨海默病胰岛素信号中的潜在用途。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Dec 13;23(24):15811. doi: 10.3390/ijms232415811.
3
Real-world evidence on the use of a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) in people with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes in Romania: a prospective cohort study (STAR.Ro).
罗马尼亚一项关于血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者使用甘精胰岛素和利西那肽固定比例复方制剂(iGlarLixi)的真实世界证据:一项前瞻性队列研究(STAR.Ro)。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 27;12(5):e060852. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060852.
4
Switching to Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100 in Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Daily Basal Insulin: A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial.在每日基础胰岛素控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中,转换使用每周一次的胰岛素伊克德与每日一次的甘精胰岛素 U100:一项 2 期随机对照试验。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jul;44(7):1586-1594. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2877. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Treatment with New Basal Insulin Analogues in Type 1 Diabetes: Nation-Wide Survey.新型基础胰岛素类似物治疗1型糖尿病的疗效与安全性:全国性调查
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Mar;11(3):725-734. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00767-4. Epub 2020 Jan 28.