Murashita Takashi, Schaff Hartzell V, Daly Richard C, Oh Jae K, Dearani Joseph A, Stulak John M, King Katherine S, Greason Kevin L
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Sep;104(3):742-750. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.05.063. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
The purpose of this study was to review the surgical outcomes of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis and to examine risk factors for overall mortality in a contemporary period.
We reviewed all patients who underwent pericardiectomy for constriction from 1936 through 2013. The investigation included constrictive pericarditis cases confirmed intraoperatively, all other types of pericarditis were excluded; 1,071 pericardiectomies were performed in 1,066 individual patients. Patients were divided into two intervals: a historical (pre-1990) group (n = 259) and a contemporary (1990-2013) group (n = 807).
Patients in the contemporary group were older (61 versus 49 years; p < 0.001), more symptomatic (NYHA class III or IV in 79.6% versus 71.2%; p < 0.001), and more frequently underwent concomitant procedures (21.4% versus 5.4%; p < 0.001) compared with those in the historical group. In contrast to the historical cases in which the etiologies of constriction were mostly idiopathic (81.1%), nearly half of contemporary cases had a nonidiopathic etiology (postoperative 32.3%, radiation 11.4%). Although 30-day mortality decreased from 13.5% in the historical era to 5.2% in the contemporary era (p < 0.001), overall survival was similar after adjusting for patient characteristics. Risk factors of overall mortality in the contemporary group included NYHA class III or IV (HR 2.17, p < 0.001), etiology of radiation (HR 3.93, p < 0.001) or postcardiac surgery (HR 1.47, p < 0.001), and need for cardiopulmonary bypass (HR 1.35, p = 0.014).
There was a significant change in disease etiology over the study period. Long-term survival after pericardiectomy is affected by patient characteristics including etiology of constriction and severity of symptoms.
本研究旨在回顾缩窄性心包炎心包切除术的手术结果,并探讨当代总体死亡率的危险因素。
我们回顾了1936年至2013年期间所有因缩窄接受心包切除术的患者。该调查纳入术中确诊的缩窄性心包炎病例,排除所有其他类型的心包炎;1066例个体患者共进行了1071例心包切除术。患者分为两个时间段:历史组(1990年前)(n = 259)和当代组(1990 - 2013年)(n = 807)。
与历史组相比,当代组患者年龄更大(61岁对49岁;p < 0.001),症状更明显(纽约心脏协会III或IV级:79.6%对71.2%;p < 0.001),且更频繁地接受同期手术(21.4%对5.4%;p < 0.001)。与历史病例不同,历史病例中缩窄病因大多为特发性(81.1%),而当代病例近一半有非特发性病因(术后32.3%,放疗后11.4%)。尽管30天死亡率从历史时期的13.5%降至当代时期的5.2%(p < 0.001),但在调整患者特征后总体生存率相似。当代组总体死亡率的危险因素包括纽约心脏协会III或IV级(HR 2.17,p < 0.001)、放疗病因(HR 3.93,p < 0.001)或心脏手术后病因(HR 1.47,p < 0.001)以及需要体外循环(HR 1.35,p = 0.014)。
在研究期间疾病病因有显著变化。心包切除术后的长期生存受患者特征影响,包括缩窄病因和症状严重程度。