• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种I期试验设计的比较。

A comparison of two phase I trial designs.

作者信息

Korn E L, Midthune D, Chen T T, Rubinstein L V, Christian M C, Simon R M

机构信息

Biometric Research Branch, EPN-739, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1994 Sep 30;13(18):1799-806. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780131802.

DOI:10.1002/sim.4780131802
PMID:7997713
Abstract

Phase I cancer chemotherapy trials are designed to determine rapidly the maximum tolerated dose of a new agent for further study. A recently proposed Bayesian method, the continual reassessment method, has been suggested to offer an improvement over the standard design of such trials. We find the previous comparisons did not completely address the relative performance of the designs as they would be used in practice. Our results indicate that with the continual reassessment method, more patients will be treated at very high doses and the trials will take longer to complete. We offer some suggested improvements to both the standard design and the Bayesian method.

摘要

I期癌症化疗试验旨在快速确定一种新药物的最大耐受剂量,以便进一步研究。最近有人提出一种贝叶斯方法,即连续重新评估法,认为该方法比此类试验的标准设计有所改进。我们发现,之前的比较没有完全涉及这些设计在实际应用中的相对性能。我们的结果表明,采用连续重新评估法时,会有更多患者接受非常高剂量的治疗,试验完成所需时间也会更长。我们对标准设计和贝叶斯方法都提出了一些改进建议。

相似文献

1
A comparison of two phase I trial designs.两种I期试验设计的比较。
Stat Med. 1994 Sep 30;13(18):1799-806. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780131802.
2
A comparison of phase I dose-finding designs in clinical trials with monotonicity assumption violation.违反单调假设的临床试验中 I 期剂量发现设计的比较。
Clin Trials. 2020 Oct;17(5):522-534. doi: 10.1177/1740774520932130. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
3
CRM2DIM: A SAS macro for implementing the dual-agent Bayesian continual reassessment method.CRM2DIM:一个用于实现双代理贝叶斯连续再评估方法的 SAS 宏。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Jul;176:211-223. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.04.025. Epub 2019 May 6.
4
Comparative review of novel model-assisted designs for phase I clinical trials.新型模型辅助设计在 I 期临床试验中的比较综述。
Stat Med. 2018 Jun 30;37(14):2208-2222. doi: 10.1002/sim.7674. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
5
np1: a computer program for dose escalation strategies in phase I clinical trials.NP1:一种用于I期临床试验剂量递增策略的计算机程序。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2007 Oct;88(1):8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.06.006. Epub 2007 Aug 24.
6
A default method to specify skeletons for Bayesian model averaging continual reassessment method for phase I clinical trials.一种为I期临床试验的贝叶斯模型平均连续重新评估法指定骨架的默认方法。
Stat Med. 2017 Jan 30;36(2):266-279. doi: 10.1002/sim.6941. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
7
The continual reassessment method and its applications: a Bayesian methodology for phase I cancer clinical trials.连续重新评估法及其应用:一种用于I期癌症临床试验的贝叶斯方法
Stat Med. 2001;20(17-18):2661-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.735.
8
Small-sample behavior of novel phase I cancer trial designs.新型 I 期癌症试验设计的小样本行为。
Clin Trials. 2013 Feb;10(1):63-80. doi: 10.1177/1740774512469311.
9
Optimal phase I dose-escalation trial designs in oncology--a simulation study.肿瘤学中最优的I期剂量递增试验设计——一项模拟研究。
Stat Med. 2008 Nov 20;27(26):5329-44. doi: 10.1002/sim.3037.
10
Modeling adverse event counts in phase I clinical trials of a cytotoxic agent.建模细胞毒剂 I 期临床试验中不良事件计数。
Clin Trials. 2018 Aug;15(4):386-397. doi: 10.1177/1740774518772309. Epub 2018 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Sequential monitoring using the Second Generation P-Value with Type I error controlled by monitoring frequency.使用第二代P值进行序贯监测,通过监测频率控制I型错误。
Am Stat. 2025;79(1):50-60. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2024.2356109. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
2
Comparison of design methods for a safety run-in phase of a phase II clinical trial.比较 II 期临床试验安全入组阶段的设计方法。
Clin Trials. 2023 Apr;20(2):181-191. doi: 10.1177/17407745221140913. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
3
Phase I CAR-T Clinical Trials Review.I 期嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞临床试验综述。
Anticancer Res. 2022 Dec;42(12):5673-5684. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16076.
4
Evaluation of solid tumor response to sequential treatment cycles via a new computational hybrid approach.通过一种新的计算混合方法评估实体瘤对序贯治疗周期的反应。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 2;11(1):21475. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00989-x.
5
Early-Phase Platform Trials: A New Paradigm for Dose Finding and Treatment Screening in the Era of Precision Oncology.早期平台试验:精准肿瘤学时代剂量探索与治疗筛选的新范式
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Oct 24;3. doi: 10.1200/PO.19.00057. eCollection 2019.
6
INFORM2 NivEnt: The first trial of the INFORM2 biomarker driven phase I/II trial series: the combination of nivolumab and entinostat in children and adolescents with refractory high-risk malignancies.INFORM2 NivEnt:INFORM2 生物标志物驱动的 I/II 期试验系列的首次试验:nivolumab 和 entinostat 联合用于治疗难治性高危恶性肿瘤的儿童和青少年。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):523. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07008-8.
7
Phase I cancer clinical trials.癌症一期临床试验。
Neurooncol Pract. 2017 Mar;4(1):67-72. doi: 10.1093/nop/npw014. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
8
Improvements to the Escalation with Overdose Control design and a comparison with the restricted Continual Reassessment Method.“过量控制递增法”设计的改进及其与受限连续重新评估法的比较。
Pharm Stat. 2019 Nov;18(6):659-670. doi: 10.1002/pst.1955. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
9
Evaluating the effects of design parameters on the performances of phase I trial designs.评估设计参数对I期试验设计性能的影响。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 May 17;15:100379. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100379. eCollection 2019 Sep.
10
How to design a dose-finding study using the continual reassessment method.如何使用连续评估法设计剂量探索研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0638-z.