Suppr超能文献

癌症关怀沟通干预中价值观和选择的影响对癌症护理和丧亲结果的个人护理者体验。

Effects of the Values and Options in Cancer Care Communication Intervention on Personal Caregiver Experiences of Cancer Care and Bereavement Outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.

Department of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy, Rutgers University School of Public Heath, Piscataway, New Jersey.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2019 Nov;22(11):1394-1400. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0078. Epub 2019 Jun 25.

Abstract

Care teams are increasingly expected to attend to the needs of patient's personal caregivers (e.g., family members). Improving communication among oncologists, patients with advanced cancer, and their personal caregivers might enhance caregivers' experiences of end-of-life (EoL) cancer care and bereavement outcomes. To explore the effects of the Values and Options in Cancer Care intervention on caregivers' experiences of EoL care and bereavement outcomes. We developed a brief behavioral intervention to improve communication among oncologists, patients with advanced cancer, and their personal caregivers. The intervention was designed to help patients/caregivers ask questions, express concerns, and help oncologists respond effectively. We randomly assigned oncologists (and their patients/caregivers) to the intervention or usual care. Medical oncologists in NY and CA; patients/personal caregivers with advanced cancer. Two months after the patient's death, caregivers completed three instruments assessing their experiences of EoL care. Seven months after the patient's death, caregivers completed the Prolonged Grief Disorder-13 (PG-13; primary prespecified outcome), the Purpose-in-Life scale, and scales assessing mental health function, depression, and anxiety. The intervention did not significantly improve caregivers' scores on the PG-13 ( = 0.21), mental health function, depression, or anxiety, but it did improve purpose-in-life scores ( = 0.018). Cohen's (95% confidence interval) for all three experiences of EoL care outcomes were promising, ranging from 0.22 (-0.19 to 0.63) to 0.39 (-0.07 to 0.86) although none was statistically significant. Preliminary findings show promise that scalable interventions in cancer care settings may improve caregiver experiences with cancer care and some bereavement outcomes.

摘要

护理团队越来越需要关注患者个人护理者(例如,家庭成员)的需求。改善肿瘤学家、晚期癌症患者及其个人护理者之间的沟通,可能会改善护理者在临终关怀和丧亲方面的体验和结果。探讨癌症护理价值观和选择干预措施对护理者临终关怀体验和丧亲结果的影响。我们开发了一个简短的行为干预措施,以改善肿瘤学家、晚期癌症患者及其个人护理者之间的沟通。该干预措施旨在帮助患者/护理者提出问题、表达关切,并帮助肿瘤学家做出有效回应。我们将肿瘤学家(及其患者/护理者)随机分配到干预组或常规护理组。纽约和加利福尼亚的医学肿瘤学家;患有晚期癌症的患者/个人护理者。在患者死亡后两个月,护理者完成了三份评估临终关怀体验的工具。在患者死亡后七个月,护理者完成了延长悲伤障碍 13 项量表(PG-13;主要预先指定的结果)、生活目的量表以及评估心理健康功能、抑郁和焦虑的量表。干预措施并未显著改善护理者在 PG-13 上的评分( = 0.21)、心理健康功能、抑郁或焦虑,但确实提高了生活目的评分( = 0.018)。所有三种临终关怀体验的 Cohen's (95%置信区间)都很有希望,范围从 0.22(-0.19 至 0.63)到 0.39(-0.07 至 0.86),尽管没有一个具有统计学意义。初步研究结果表明,癌症护理环境中的可扩展干预措施可能会改善护理者的癌症护理体验和一些丧亲结果。

相似文献

2
The impact of the caregiver-oncologist relationship on caregiver experiences of end-of-life care and bereavement outcomes.
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Sep;28(9):4219-4225. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05185-2. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
3
Cancer Caregivers' Prognostic and End-of-Life Communication Needs and Experiences and their Impact.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Jan;65(1):16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.09.012. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
6
The end-of-life experience: modifiable predictors of caregivers' bereavement adjustment.
Cancer. 2014 Mar 15;120(6):918-25. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28495. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
8
Depressive-Symptom Trajectories From End-of-Life Caregiving Through the First 2 Bereavement Years for Family Caregivers of Advanced Cancer Patients.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Oct;62(4):699-708. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.03.018. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
9
Psychological Distress in Bereaved Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Cancer.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Mar;61(3):488-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.08.028. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

4
On the concept, taxonomy, and transculturality of disordered grief.
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 5;14:1165421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1165421. eCollection 2023.
8
Cancer Caregivers' Prognostic and End-of-Life Communication Needs and Experiences and their Impact.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Jan;65(1):16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.09.012. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
9
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
10
Patient-caregiver communication concordance in cancer-refinement of the Cancer Communication Assessment Tool in an Australian sample.
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Sep;30(9):7387-7396. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07163-7. Epub 2022 May 25.

本文引用的文献

2
Family caregiver descriptions of stopping chemotherapy and end-of-life transitions.
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Feb;27(2):669-675. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4365-0. Epub 2018 Jul 28.
4
A Randomized Trial of a Family-Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units.
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 21;378(25):2365-2375. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802637. Epub 2018 May 23.
6
Purpose in Life and Positive Health Outcomes Among Older Adults.
Popul Health Manag. 2018 Apr;21(2):139-147. doi: 10.1089/pop.2017.0063. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
7
Effects of End-of-Life Discussions on the Mental Health of Bereaved Family Members and Quality of Patient Death and Care.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Jul;54(1):17-26.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
9
A review of family caregiving intervention trials in oncology.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jul 8;67(4):318-325. doi: 10.3322/caac.21396. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
10
Promoting End-of-Life Discussions in Advanced Cancer: Effects of Patient Coaching and Question Prompt Lists.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar 10;35(8):842-851. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.5651. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验