Yang C, Crystal Y O, Ruff R R, Veitz-Keenan A, McGowan R C, Niederman R
Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, College of Dentistry, New York University, New York City, NY, USA.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, New York University, New York City, NY, USA.
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2020 Apr;5(2):109-117. doi: 10.1177/2380084419855636. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
Children's oral health-related quality of life (COHQoL) measures are well known and widely used. However, rigorous systematic reviews of these measures and analyses of their quality are in absence.
To systematically review and quantitatively assess the quality of COHQoL measures through a scoping review.
Systematic literature search of PubMed, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database), HaPI (Health and Psychosocial Instruments), and DOSS (Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source).
The measure's focus was COHQoL; the child age ranged from 5 to 14 years; the publication was either a research article or a systematic review and related to caries; and it was written in English or had an English abstract. Two authors independently selected the studies. Disagreements were reconciled by group discussions with a third author.
The International Society for Quality of Life Research minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures were used for quality appraisal.
Descriptive analysis.
We identified 18 measures. Their quality scores ranged from 9.5 to 15.0 on a scale of 16. The quality appeared to bear no relationship to the citation and use of these measures. However, elements of these measures might be more useful than others, depending on the age-specific use and primary quality concerns.
Some of the information on the minimum standards of the 18 measures cannot be found in the existing literature. Measures published without English abstract were not searched.
The quality of these measures is suboptimal. Researchers and practitioners in this field should exercise caution when choosing and using these measures. Efforts at improving the quality of the COHQoL measures, such as refining existing ones or developing new measures, are warranted.
Researchers, clinician scientists, and clinicians can use the results of this study when deciding which oral health-related quality of life measure they wish to use in children.
儿童口腔健康相关生活质量(COHQoL)测评方法广为人知且应用广泛。然而,目前尚无对这些测评方法的严格系统评价及其质量分析。
通过范围综述对COHQoL测评方法进行系统评价并定量评估其质量。
对PubMed、CINAHL(护理学与健康相关文献累积索引)、EMBASE(医学文摘数据库)、HaPI(健康与心理社会测量工具)和DOSS(牙科学与口腔科学资源库)进行系统文献检索。
测评重点为COHQoL;儿童年龄范围为5至14岁;出版物为研究文章或系统评价且与龋齿相关;以英文撰写或有英文摘要。两名作者独立筛选研究。分歧通过与第三位作者的小组讨论解决。
采用国际生活质量研究协会患者报告结局测评的最低标准进行质量评估。
描述性分析。
我们识别出18种测评方法。其质量得分在16分制中为9.5至15.0分。质量似乎与这些测评方法的引用和使用情况无关。然而,根据特定年龄的使用情况和主要质量关注点,这些测评方法的某些要素可能比其他要素更有用。
现有文献中找不到18种测评方法最低标准的一些信息。未检索无英文摘要发表的测评方法。
这些测评方法的质量欠佳。该领域的研究人员和从业者在选择和使用这些测评方法时应谨慎。有必要努力提高COHQoL测评方法的质量,如完善现有方法或开发新方法。
研究人员、临床科学家和临床医生在决定希望在儿童中使用哪种口腔健康相关生活质量测评方法时可参考本研究结果。