Suppr超能文献

2010 年至 2014 年美国胸外科手术的城乡差异。

Rural-Urban Differences in Access to Thoracic Surgery in the United States, 2010 to 2014.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina; Rural & Minority Health Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.

Rural & Minority Health Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina; Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Oct;108(4):1087-1093. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.04.113. Epub 2019 Jun 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because of recent lung cancer screening recommendations and corresponding insurance coverage, it is expected that more early stage cases will be identified that require thoracic surgery. However, these services may not be equally available in all regions. Our objective is to describe the availability of thoracic surgeons by examining geographic variation, rural-urban differences, and temporal changes before and after screening recommendation and insurance coverage policy changes.

METHODS

We examined the U.S. thoracic surgery workforce using the 2010 and 2014 Area Health Resource Files. We calculated the density of thoracic surgeons per 100,000 persons for each year at the state and county level. We performed descriptive statistics and developed maps highlighting changes over time and geographic regions.

RESULTS

Despite an overall increase in thoracic surgeons from 2010 to 2014, we observed declining density nationwide (1.5% change) and in sparsely populated states. The difference in thoracic surgeon density widened slightly between 2010 from 0.80 per 100,000 compared with 0.84 per 100,000 in 2014 in all rural counties compared with urban counties (P < .001 for both years). The difference in thoracic surgeon density was most pronounced between small adjacent rural and urban counties (0.95 and 0.96 per 100,000 for 2010 and 2014, respectively; P < .001 for both years). The Northeast held a disproportionate share of the thoracic surgery workforce.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited access to thoracic surgeons in rural areas is a concern, given an older and retiring surgical workforce, the higher burden of lung cancer in rural areas, and recent policy changes for screening reimbursement.

摘要

背景

由于最近的肺癌筛查建议和相应的保险覆盖范围,预计将有更多的早期病例需要进行胸外科手术。然而,这些服务在所有地区可能并不均等提供。我们的目的是通过检查地理差异、城乡差异以及筛查建议和保险覆盖政策变化前后的时间变化,来描述胸外科医生的可用性。

方法

我们使用 2010 年和 2014 年的区域卫生资源档案检查了美国的胸外科医生队伍。我们计算了每年每 10 万人的胸外科医生密度,按州和县进行计算。我们进行了描述性统计,并制作了地图,突出显示了随时间和地理区域的变化。

结果

尽管 2010 年至 2014 年胸外科医生的总数有所增加,但我们观察到全国范围内(减少 1.5%)和人口稀少的州的密度下降。2010 年与 2014 年相比,所有农村县与城市县的胸外科医生密度差异略有扩大,从每 10 万人 0.80 人扩大到每 10 万人 0.84 人(两年均 P <.001)。小相邻农村和城市县之间的胸外科医生密度差异最为显著,分别为每 10 万人 0.95 人和 0.96 人(2010 年和 2014 年分别为 P <.001)。东北地区拥有不成比例的胸外科医生队伍。

结论

鉴于手术队伍老龄化和退休、农村地区肺癌负担较高以及最近筛查报销政策的变化,农村地区获得胸外科医生的机会有限令人担忧。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验