• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿巴西普:从预算影响模型到成本效益分析——来自随机对照试验和现实生活的数据。

Abatacept: from a budget impact model to cost-effectiveness analysis - data from RCT and real life.

作者信息

Benucci Maurizio, Damiani Arianna, Manfredi Mariangela, Infantino Maria, Grossi Valentina, Li Gobbi Francesca

机构信息

Rheumatology Unit, S.Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Immunology and Allergology Laboratory Unit, S.Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Azienda USL-Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Jun 7;11:405-409. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S192910. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S192910
PMID:31239737
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6560192/
Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disorder that affects joints with swelling and progressive joint destruction. The pathology leads to a progressive disability with an impact on the quality of life of the patients. Strategies to reduce in-patient care costs could have a considerable impact on lowering the direct medical costs of RA in Italy. Abatacept, a selective T-cell costimulation modulator, is a valuable treatment option for patients with moderate-to-severe RA. A search using the keywords "cost-effectiveness analysis", "budget impact model", "abatacept", and "rheumatoid arthritis" was carried out on PubMed. Abatacept in the first- and second-treatment lines has been evaluated in our research. We evaluated patients with inadequate MTX response, inadequate anti-TNF agents response, switch studies and real-world data. Furthermore, in our research, we evaluated the main head-to-head studies published.

摘要

类风湿关节炎(RA)是一种慢性炎症性疾病,会导致关节肿胀并进行性破坏。这种病理状况会导致患者逐渐残疾,影响其生活质量。降低住院护理成本的策略可能会对降低意大利RA的直接医疗成本产生重大影响。阿巴西普是一种选择性T细胞共刺激调节剂,对于中重度RA患者是一种有价值的治疗选择。我们在PubMed上使用关键词“成本效益分析”“预算影响模型”“阿巴西普”和“类风湿关节炎”进行了检索。我们的研究评估了阿巴西普在一线和二线治疗中的情况。我们评估了甲氨蝶呤(MTX)反应不足、抗TNF药物反应不足的患者、换药研究及真实世界数据。此外,在我们的研究中,我们评估了已发表的主要头对头研究。

相似文献

1
Abatacept: from a budget impact model to cost-effectiveness analysis - data from RCT and real life.阿巴西普:从预算影响模型到成本效益分析——来自随机对照试验和现实生活的数据。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Jun 7;11:405-409. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S192910. eCollection 2019.
2
Cost-effectiveness of early treatment of ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis patients with abatacept.早期使用阿巴西普治疗抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性类风湿关节炎患者的成本效益分析。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018 May-Jun;36(3):448-454. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
3
Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, tocilizumab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis not previously treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and after the failure of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs only: systematic review and economic evaluation.阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗、戈利木单抗、托珠单抗和阿巴西普用于治疗既往未使用改善病情抗风湿药物治疗且仅在传统改善病情抗风湿药物治疗失败后的类风湿关节炎:系统评价和经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(35):1-610. doi: 10.3310/hta20350.
4
Abatacept in biologic-naïve patients and TNF inadequate responders: clinical data in focus.初治生物制剂患者及肿瘤坏死因子反应不足患者中的阿巴西普:重点临床数据
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Aug;24(8):2283-94. doi: 10.1185/03007990802223129. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
5
Cost per response for abatacept versus adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis by ACPA subgroups in Germany, Italy, Spain, US and Canada.在德国、意大利、西班牙、美国和加拿大,按抗环瓜氨酸肽(ACPA)亚组划分,类风湿关节炎中阿巴西普与阿达木单抗的每反应成本。
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Jul;37(7):1111-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3739-9. Epub 2017 May 30.
6
Assessing the cost-effectiveness of biologic agents for the management of moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis in anti-TNF inadequate responders in Italy: a modelling approach.评估生物制剂在意大利抗 TNF 应答不足的中重度类风湿关节炎患者中的成本效益:一种建模方法。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011 Jul-Aug;29(4):633-41. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
7
Cost-effectiveness of abatacept in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate.阿巴西普治疗中度至重度活动性类风湿关节炎且对甲氨蝶呤反应不足患者的成本效益
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008 Apr;47(4):535-41. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken007.
8
Cost-effectiveness of abatacept in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists.阿巴西普治疗中度至重度活动性类风湿关节炎且对肿瘤坏死因子-α拮抗剂反应不足患者的成本效益
J Rheumatol. 2008 Sep;35(9):1745-53. Epub 2008 Jul 15.
9
Clinical and patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials of abatacept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.阿巴西普治疗类风湿关节炎临床试验中的临床及患者报告结局
Clin Ther. 2008 Mar;30(3):429-42. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.03.002.
10
Abatacept or infliximab for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: an Italian trial-based and real-life cost-consequence analysis.阿巴西普或英夫利昔单抗治疗甲氨蝶呤治疗应答不佳的类风湿关节炎患者:一项意大利基于试验和真实世界的成本-效果分析。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013 Jul-Aug;31(4):575-83. Epub 2013 May 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Short-term costs associated with non-medical switching in autoimmune conditions.自身免疫性疾病中非医疗换药相关的短期成本。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019 Jan-Feb;37(1):97-105. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
2
Alternative tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or abatacept or rituximab following failure of initial TNFi in rheumatoid arthritis: the SWITCH RCT.类风湿关节炎初始 TNFi 治疗失败后应用替代肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)或阿巴西普或利妥昔单抗:SWITCH RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Jun;22(34):1-280. doi: 10.3310/hta22340.
3
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Abatacept Compared with Adalimumab on Background Methotrexate in Biologic-Naive Adult Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Poor Prognosis.与阿达木单抗相比,阿巴西普联合背景甲氨蝶呤用于初治类风湿关节炎且预后不良成年患者的成本效益分析
Value Health. 2018 Feb;21(2):193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
4
Cost-effectiveness of early treatment of ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis patients with abatacept.早期使用阿巴西普治疗抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性类风湿关节炎患者的成本效益分析。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018 May-Jun;36(3):448-454. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
5
Switching from the bio-originators to biosimilar: is it premature to recommend this procedure?从生物原研药转换为生物类似药:推荐此做法是否为时过早?
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Apr;78(4):e23. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212820. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
6
Cost per response for abatacept versus adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis by ACPA subgroups in Germany, Italy, Spain, US and Canada.在德国、意大利、西班牙、美国和加拿大,按抗环瓜氨酸肽(ACPA)亚组划分,类风湿关节炎中阿巴西普与阿达木单抗的每反应成本。
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Jul;37(7):1111-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3739-9. Epub 2017 May 30.
7
Persistence, switch rates, drug consumption and costs of biological treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study in Italy.类风湿关节炎生物治疗的持续性、转换率、药物消耗及成本:意大利的一项观察性研究
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Dec 21;9:9-17. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S108730. eCollection 2017.
8
Pharmacoeconomics of Biosimilars: What Is There to Gain from Them?生物类似药的药物经济学:它们能带来什么好处?
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2016 Aug;18(8):50. doi: 10.1007/s11926-016-0601-0.
9
Costs associated with rheumatoid arthritis in Italy: past, present, and future.意大利类风湿关节炎相关费用:过去、现在与未来。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Feb 10;8:33-41. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S91006. eCollection 2016.
10
Drug usage analysis and health care resources consumption in naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis.初治类风湿关节炎患者的药物使用分析及医疗资源消耗
Biologics. 2015 Nov 6;9:119-27. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S89286. eCollection 2015.