National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Medicine and.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov 1;200(9):1146-1153. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201903-0493OC.
The level of diagnostic likelihood at which physicians prescribe antifibrotic therapy without requesting surgical lung biopsy (SLB) in patients suspected of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is unknown. To determine how often physicians advocate SLB in patient subgroups defined by IPF likelihood and risk associated with SLB, and to identify the level of diagnostic likelihood at which physicians prescribe antifibrotic therapy with requesting SLB. An international cohort of respiratory physicians evaluated 60 cases of interstitial lung disease, giving: ) differential diagnoses with diagnostic likelihood; ) a decision on the need for SLB; and ) initial management. Diagnoses were stratified according to diagnostic likelihood bands described by Ryerson and colleagues. A total of 404 physicians evaluated the 60 cases (24,240 physician-patient evaluations). IPF was part of the differential diagnosis in 9,958/24,240 (41.1%) of all physician-patient evaluations. SLB was requested in 8.1%, 29.6%, and 48.4% of definite, provisional high-confidence and provisional low-confidence diagnoses of IPF, respectively. In 63.0% of provisional high-confidence IPF diagnoses, antifibrotic therapy was prescribed without requesting SLB. No significant mortality difference was observed between cases given a definite diagnosis of IPF (90-100% diagnostic likelihood) and cases given a provisional high-confidence IPF diagnosis (hazard ratio, 0.97; = 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.04). Most respiratory physicians prescribe antifibrotic therapy without requesting an SLB if a provisional high-confidence diagnosis or "working diagnosis" of IPF can be made (likelihood ≥ 70%). SLB is recommended in only a minority of patients with suspected, but not definite, IPF.
在疑似特发性肺纤维化 (IPF) 患者中,医生在不要求进行外科肺活检 (SLB) 的情况下开具抗纤维化治疗的诊断可能性水平尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定医生在基于 IPF 可能性和与 SLB 相关风险的患者亚组中推荐 SLB 的频率,并确定医生在开具抗纤维化治疗同时要求进行 SLB 的诊断可能性水平。一组国际呼吸科医生评估了 60 例间质性肺疾病患者,提供了:) 鉴别诊断及其诊断可能性;) 是否需要 SLB 的决策;和) 初始管理。诊断根据 Ryerson 等人描述的诊断可能性带进行分层。共有 404 名医生评估了 60 例病例(24240 例医患评估)。在所有医患评估中,9958/24240(41.1%)的病例将 IPF 作为鉴别诊断的一部分。分别在明确诊断、暂定高可信度和暂定低可信度 IPF 诊断中,分别有 8.1%、29.6%和 48.4%的患者要求进行 SLB。在 63.0%的暂定高可信度 IPF 诊断中,在未要求进行 SLB 的情况下开具了抗纤维化治疗。在被诊断为明确 IPF(诊断可能性 90-100%)的病例和被诊断为暂定高可信度 IPF 的病例之间,未观察到死亡率的显著差异(风险比,0.97;=0.65;95%置信区间,0.90-1.04)。如果可以做出暂定高可信度的 IPF 诊断或“工作诊断”(可能性≥70%),大多数呼吸科医生会在不要求进行 SLB 的情况下开具抗纤维化治疗。仅推荐少数疑似而非明确的 IPF 患者进行 SLB。