Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Ghana, Accra.
JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):853-859. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1744.
Inguinal hernia is the most common general surgical condition in the world. Although task sharing of surgical care with nonsurgeons represents one method to increase access to essential surgery, the safety and outcomes of this strategy are not well described for hernia repair.
To compare outcomes after inguinal hernia repair with mesh performed by medical doctors and surgeons in Ghana.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study was conducted from February 15, 2017, to September 17, 2018, at the Volta Regional Hospital in Ho, Ghana. Following successful completion of a training course, 3 medical doctors and 2 surgeons performed inguinal hernia repair with mesh according to the Lichtenstein technique on 242 men with primary, reducible inguinal hernia.
The primary end point was hernia recurrence at 1 year. The noninferiority limit was set at 5 percentage points. Secondary end points included postoperative complications at 2 weeks and patient satisfaction, pain, and self-assessed health status at 1 year.
Two-hundred forty-two patients were included; 119 men underwent operations performed by medical doctors and 123 men underwent operations performed by surgeons. Preoperative patient characteristics were similar in both groups. Two-hundred thirty-seven patients (97.9%) were seen at follow-up at 2 weeks, and 223 patients (92.1%) were seen at follow-up at 1 year. The absolute difference in recurrence rate between the medical doctor group (1 [0.9%]) and the surgeon group (3 [2.8%]) was -1.9 (1-tailed 95% CI, -4.8; P < .001), demonstrating noninferiority of the medical doctors. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications (34 [29.1%] vs 29 [24.2%]), patient satisfaction (112 [98.2%] vs 108 [99.1%]), severe chronic pain (1 [0.9%] vs 4 [3.7%]), or self-assessed health (85.9 vs 83.7 of 100) for medical doctors and surgeons.
This study shows that medical doctors can be trained to perform elective inguinal hernia repair with mesh in men with good results and high patient satisfaction in a low-resource setting. This finding supports surgical task sharing to combat the global burden of hernia disease.
腹股沟疝是世界上最常见的普通外科疾病。尽管将外科护理任务与非外科医生分担是增加基本手术可及性的一种方法,但这种策略在疝修补术中的安全性和结果尚不清楚。
比较在加纳由医生和外科医生进行的网片腹股沟疝修补术的结果。
设计、地点和参与者:这项前瞻性队列研究于 2017 年 2 月 15 日至 2018 年 9 月 17 日在加纳霍的沃尔特地区医院进行。在成功完成培训课程后,3 名医生和 2 名外科医生根据 Lichtenstein 技术对 242 名患有原发性、可复性腹股沟疝的男性进行了网片腹股沟疝修补术。
1 年时的疝复发。非劣效性界限设定为 5 个百分点。次要终点包括术后 2 周的并发症以及 1 年时的患者满意度、疼痛和自我评估的健康状况。
共纳入 242 例患者;119 例男性由医生进行手术,123 例男性由外科医生进行手术。两组患者的术前特征相似。237 例(97.9%)患者在术后 2 周时接受了随访,223 例(92.1%)患者在术后 1 年时接受了随访。医生组(1[0.9%])和外科医生组(3[2.8%])之间复发率的绝对差异为-1.9(单侧 95%CI,-4.8;P<.001),表明医生组非劣效。术后并发症(34[29.1%] vs 29[24.2%])、患者满意度(112[98.2%] vs 108[99.1%])、严重慢性疼痛(1[0.9%] vs 4[3.7%])或自我评估的健康状况(医生为 85.9,外科医生为 83.7)差异均无统计学意义。
这项研究表明,在资源匮乏的环境下,医生可以接受培训,对男性进行择期腹股沟疝网片修补术,效果良好,患者满意度高。这一发现支持通过分担外科手术任务来应对全球疝病负担。