Suppr超能文献

解释腹侧疝和腹股沟疝修补结果的差异:一项基于人群的分析。

Explaining variation in ventral and inguinal hernia repair outcomes: A population-based analysis.

作者信息

Aquina Christopher T, Fleming Fergal J, Becerra Adan Z, Xu Zhaomin, Hensley Bradley J, Noyes Katia, Monson John R T, Jusko Todd A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Surgical Health Outcomes and Research Enterprise (SHORE), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.

Department of Surgery, Surgical Health Outcomes and Research Enterprise (SHORE), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.

出版信息

Surgery. 2017 Sep;162(3):628-639. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 May 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

No study has evaluated the relative importance of patient, surgeon, and hospital-level factors on surgeon and hospital variation in hernia reoperation rates. This population-based retrospective cohort study evaluated factors associated with variation in reoperation rates for recurrence after initial ventral hernia repair and inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System identified initial ventral hernia repairs and inguinal hernia repairs in New York state from 2003-2009. Mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed assessing factors associated with surgeon/hospital variation in 5-year reoperation rates for hernia recurrence.

RESULTS

Among 78,267 ventral hernia repairs and 124,416 inguinal hernia repairs, the proportion of total variation in reoperation rates attributable to individual surgeons compared with hospitals was 87% for ventral hernia repairs and 92% for inguinal hernia repairs. In explaining variation in ventral hernia repair reoperation between surgeons, 19% was attributable to patient-level factors, 4% attributable to mesh placement, and 10% attributable to surgeon volume and type of board certification. In explaining variation in inguinal hernia repair reoperation between surgeons, 1.1% was attributable to mesh placement and 10% was attributable to surgeon volume and years of experience. However, 67% of the variation between surgeons for ventral hernia repair and 89% of the variation between surgeons for inguinal hernia repair remained unexplained by factors in the models.

CONCLUSION

The majority of variation in hernia reoperation rates is attributable to surgeon-level variation. This suggests that hernia recurrence may be an appropriate surgeon quality metric. While modifiable factors such as mesh placement and surgeon characteristics play roles in surgeon variation, future research should focus on identifying additional surgeon attributes responsible for this variation.

摘要

背景

尚无研究评估患者、外科医生和医院层面的因素对疝气再次手术率中外科医生和医院差异的相对重要性。这项基于人群的回顾性队列研究评估了初次腹疝修补术和腹股沟疝修补术后复发再次手术率差异的相关因素。

方法

全州规划与研究合作系统确定了2003年至2009年纽约州的初次腹疝修补术和腹股沟疝修补术。进行了混合效应Cox比例风险分析,评估与疝气复发5年再次手术率的外科医生/医院差异相关的因素。

结果

在78267例腹疝修补术和124416例腹股沟疝修补术中,腹疝修补术和腹股沟疝修补术归因于个体外科医生而非医院的再次手术率总差异比例分别为87%和92%。在解释外科医生之间腹疝修补术再次手术的差异时,19%归因于患者层面的因素,4%归因于补片放置,10%归因于外科医生手术量和委员会认证类型。在解释外科医生之间腹股沟疝修补术再次手术的差异时,1.1%归因于补片放置,10%归因于外科医生手术量和经验年限。然而,模型中的因素无法解释腹疝修补术外科医生之间67%的差异以及腹股沟疝修补术外科医生之间89%的差异。

结论

疝气再次手术率的大部分差异归因于外科医生层面的差异。这表明疝气复发可能是一个合适的外科医生质量指标。虽然补片放置和外科医生特征等可改变因素在外科医生差异中起作用,但未来研究应侧重于确定造成这种差异的其他外科医生属性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验