Care and Public Health Research Centre, Department of International Health, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Novel Psychoactive Substance Unit, Centre for Clinical & Health Research Services, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 26;14(6):e0218011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218011. eCollection 2019.
The rapid rise in trade and use of NPS and the lack of information concerning their potential toxicity pose serious challenges to public health authorities across the world. Policy measures towards NPS taken so far have a special focus on their legal status, while the implementation of a public health strategy seems to be still missing. The aim of this study is to perform a general assessment of NPS-related policy (including regulatory measures and public health strategies) implemented by six European countries: Portugal, the Netherlands, Czech Republic, Poland, the United Kingdom and Sweden.
Six EU countries were included in this scoping review study. Drug policies (including legal responses and public health strategies) were analysed. UNODC drug policy classification system was used as a benchmark, while path dependency approach was used for data analysis; a net of inter-dependencies between international, EU and national policies was highlighted.
The countries included in this study can be placed in a wide spectrum according to their formulation of drug policy, from Portugal and the UK that have specific legal responses to NPS but have differently focused on harm reduction strategies at one end, to Sweden whose drug-free society goal is not translated into a specific regulation of NPS at the other end.
The findings of the study reveal limited development towards harmonisation of national drug policies-particularly with regard to NPS. To tackle the challenge presented by NPS, EU Member states have formulated legislation and public health strategies independently. National approaches to NPS are therefore in line with their already existing drug policies, reflecting cultural values towards substance abuse and national political interests, while the homogenization at an international level has so far mostly been focused on law enforcement and drugs use preventive strategies.
新精神活性物质(NPS)的贸易和使用迅速增加,而有关其潜在毒性的信息却十分匮乏,这给世界各国的公共卫生部门带来了严峻挑战。迄今为止,针对 NPS 所采取的政策措施特别侧重于其法律地位,而实施公共卫生战略似乎仍有所欠缺。本研究旨在对六个欧洲国家(葡萄牙、荷兰、捷克共和国、波兰、英国和瑞典)实施的 NPS 相关政策(包括监管措施和公共卫生战略)进行全面评估。
本研究纳入了六个欧盟国家。分析了毒品政策(包括法律应对措施和公共卫生战略)。采用了毒品和犯罪问题办公室毒品政策分类系统作为基准,并采用路径依赖方法进行数据分析;突出了国际、欧盟和国家政策之间相互依存的网络。
根据其毒品政策的制定情况,本研究纳入的国家可以被归入一个广泛的范畴,从对 NPS 有具体法律应对措施但在一端侧重于减少伤害策略的葡萄牙和英国,到另一端其无毒品社会目标并未转化为 NPS 具体法规的瑞典。
研究结果表明,国家毒品政策的协调发展有限——特别是在 NPS 方面。为应对 NPS 带来的挑战,欧盟成员国各自制定了立法和公共卫生战略。因此,各国对 NPS 的处理方式与其现有的毒品政策一致,反映了对药物滥用的文化价值观和国家政治利益,而在国际层面上的同质化迄今为止主要集中在执法和毒品使用预防战略上。