Program in Public Health (Bruckner, Singh) and School of Medicine (Chakravarthy), University of California, Irvine, Irvine; School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley (Snowden); College of Public Health and Human Sciences, School of Social and Behavioral Health Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis (Yoon).
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Oct 1;70(10):901-906. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800553. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
Regional primary health care system capacity may affect the demand for psychiatric visits to the emergency department (ED). In the United States, community health centers (CHCs), which serve low-income regions regardless of individuals' ability to pay, expanded primary care services by over 70% in the past decade. No research, however, evaluates whether this expansion affects overall psychiatric ED visits. This hypothesis is tested in 143 U.S. counties that expanded CHC services.
For the years 2006 through 2011, 18.84 million psychiatric outpatient ED visits were aggregated by county-year for the 143 U.S. counties with a participating CHC. The rate of psychiatric ED cases in a county-year is the dependent variable. Two independent variables were examined: total patients seen at CHCs and total patients receiving mental health services at CHCs. Fixed-effects regression methods controlled for county effects, year effects, and other health care and sociodemographic factors.
Psychiatric ED visits fell below expected levels in county-years where the volume of overall CHC patients rose (coefficient=-0.059; standard error=0.027, p=0.03). Findings indicate no relation between the volume of mental health patients seen at CHCs and psychiatric ED visits.
An increase in general primary health care to an underserved population, in the form of CHCs, corresponds with a decline in psychiatric ED visits. This result coheres with a recent Medicaid expansion experiment in which increased access to general primary care reduced the prevalence of undiagnosed and untreated depression. Findings, if replicated, may hold policy implications for regional health systems.
区域初级卫生保健系统的能力可能会影响到到急诊部(ED)就诊的精神科需求。在美国,社区卫生中心(CHC)无论个人支付能力如何,都为低收入地区提供了超过 70%的初级保健服务。然而,没有研究评估这种扩张是否会影响整体精神科急诊就诊量。在 143 个扩大 CHC 服务的美国县进行了这一假设的检验。
在 2006 年至 2011 年期间,对 143 个有参与 CHC 的美国县的县-年数据进行了汇总,共有 1884 万例精神科门诊急诊就诊。县-年的精神科急诊就诊率是因变量。检查了两个独立变量:CHC 就诊的总患者人数和 CHC 接受精神卫生服务的总患者人数。固定效应回归方法控制了县效应、年效应以及其他医疗保健和社会人口因素。
在 CHC 患者总数增加的县-年,精神科急诊就诊量低于预期水平(系数=-0.059;标准误差=0.027,p=0.03)。研究结果表明,CHC 就诊的精神卫生患者数量与精神科急诊就诊量之间没有关系。
以 CHC 为代表的向服务不足人群提供的一般初级卫生保健的增加,与精神科急诊就诊量的下降相对应。这一结果与最近的医疗补助扩大实验结果一致,即增加一般初级保健的获得机会降低了未确诊和未经治疗的抑郁症的患病率。如果结果得到复制,可能对区域卫生系统具有政策意义。