Suppr超能文献

苏格兰监狱工作人员对无烟监狱电子烟潜在益处和风险的看法:一项定性焦点小组研究。

Views of prison staff in Scotland on the potential benefits and risks of e-cigarettes in smoke-free prisons: a qualitative focus group study.

机构信息

Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling Institute for Social Marketing, Stirling, UK.

MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 25;9(6):e027799. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027799.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) were introduced into all Scottish prisons in February 2018, some months after prisons began preparing in 2017 for a smoking ban implemented in November 2018. In 2016/2017, prison staff views on the potential benefits and risks of e-cigarettes were explored in advance of the introduction of: (1) a smoking ban and (2) e-cigarettes.

SETTING

Fourteen prisons in Scotland.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventeen focus groups and two paired interviews were conducted with 132 staff in 14 Scottish prisons 4-9 months before plans for a smoking ban were announced in July 2017. Both smoking and non-smoking staff were invited to participate.

RESULTS

Prison staff highlighted three potential risks of e-cigarettes in smoke-free prisons: staff health risks from e-cigarette vapour; prisoner health risks from vaping; and risks to both groups from e-cigarette misuse, defects or accidents. Conversely, potential benefits of e-cigarettes in smoke-free prisons centred on: reducing smoking-related health harms to staff and prisoners; helping prisoners to manage without tobacco; and supporting staff to maintain safety and discipline in prison. Staff who participated in focus groups had limited experience of vaping and expressed some uncertainty and misunderstandings about e-cigarettes.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight that scientific uncertainty, misunderstanding about vaping, the complexity of prisons as workplaces and prison tobacco control policy all have implications for staff perceptions of the potential place of e-cigarettes in smoke-free prisons. To alleviate staff concerns, there is a need for reliable information on e-cigarettes. Staff may also require reassurances on whether products are 'tamper proof', and rules about vaping indoors.

摘要

目的

2018 年 2 月,电子烟(e-cigarettes)在苏格兰所有监狱引入,在此之前的几个月,即 2017 年,监狱开始为 2018 年 11 月实施的禁烟令做准备。在 2016/2017 年,在引入(1)禁烟令和(2)电子烟之前,探讨了监狱工作人员对电子烟潜在益处和风险的看法。

背景

苏格兰的 14 所监狱。

参与者

在 2017 年 7 月宣布禁烟令计划之前的 4-9 个月,14 所苏格兰监狱的 132 名工作人员参加了 17 个焦点小组和两个配对访谈。邀请了吸烟和不吸烟的工作人员参加。

结果

监狱工作人员强调了电子烟在无烟监狱中的三个潜在风险:电子烟蒸气对工作人员健康的危害;囚犯因蒸气而面临的健康风险;电子烟的误用、缺陷或事故对两组人员的风险。相反,电子烟在无烟监狱中的潜在益处集中在:减少吸烟对工作人员和囚犯的健康危害;帮助囚犯在没有烟草的情况下进行管理;并支持工作人员在监狱中维持安全和纪律。参加焦点小组的工作人员对蒸气的经验有限,对电子烟表示出一些不确定性和误解。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,科学不确定性、对蒸气的误解、监狱作为工作场所的复杂性以及监狱的烟草控制政策都对工作人员对电子烟在无烟监狱中潜在用途的看法产生了影响。为了减轻工作人员的担忧,需要有关电子烟的可靠信息。工作人员可能还需要对产品是否“防篡改”以及室内蒸气的规则得到保证。

相似文献

6

引用本文的文献

9
Examining Arrest and Cigarette Smoking in Emerging Adulthood.审视成年初期的心脏骤停与吸烟情况。
Tob Use Insights. 2020 Feb 6;13:1179173X20904350. doi: 10.1177/1179173X20904350. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

8
E-cigarettes made especially for inmates.专门为囚犯制造的电子烟。
Tob Control. 2014 Nov;23(e2):e87-8. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051535. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
9
The definition of harm reduction.减少伤害的定义。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 1998 Jun;17(2):213-9. doi: 10.1080/09595239800187011.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验