Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 26;9(1):9292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45717-8.
Body mass index (BMI) has limited accuracy for predicting cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and is not capable of identifying sarcopenic obesity, the combination of sarcopenia (an age-associated decline in muscle mass and physical function) and obesity. To overcome this, the z-score of the log-transformed A Body Shape Index (LBSIZ) was recently introduced as a measure of obesity using waist circumference, height, and weight. We aimed to investigate the association of LBSIZ with sarcopenic obesity and CVD, and propose appropriate cut-off values using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2016 data. Of 92,062 participants, 40,468 adults (≥20 years) were included. Overall area under curve (AUC) of LBSIZ was 0.735 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.716-0.754) for sarcopenic obesity, and 0.695 (95% CI: 0.687-0.703) for CVD. The subgroup analysis of ethnicity/race showed similar results. Waist circumference (WC), BMI, conicity index, body roundness index (BRI), Clinica Universidad de Navarra-Body Adiposity Estimator (CUN-BAE), new BMI, and waist to height ratio (WHtR) showed a negative association with sarcopenic obesity, while LBSIZ and conicity index showed a positive association. The AUC of LBSIZ was significantly higher for sarcopenic obesity than that of conicity index (p < 0.001). The AUC of LBSIZ was significantly higher for CVD than those of parameters including WC, BMI, BRI, CUN-BAE, new BMI, and WHtR (p < 0.001). The AUC for conicity index alone was comparable to that of LBSIZ for CVD. Overall LBSIZ cut-off was 0.35 for both sarcopenic obesity (sensitivity, 65.3%; specificity, 71.5%) and CVD (sensitivity, 63.3%; specificity, 66.6%). These results may be useful not only to identify sarcopenic obesity, but also to conduct CVD risk assessment in the clinical setting.
体重指数 (BMI) 预测心血管疾病 (CVD) 的准确性有限,并且无法识别肌少症性肥胖,即肌少症(与年龄相关的肌肉质量和身体功能下降)与肥胖的结合。为了克服这一问题,最近引入了对数转换 A 体型指数 (LBSIZ) 的 z 分数作为使用腰围、身高和体重衡量肥胖的指标。我们旨在使用 1999-2016 年全国健康和营养检查调查的数据,研究 LBSIZ 与肌少症性肥胖和 CVD 的关联,并提出适当的截断值。在 92062 名参与者中,纳入了 40468 名成年人(≥20 岁)。LBSIZ 的总体曲线下面积(AUC)为肌少症性肥胖的 0.735(95%置信区间 [CI]:0.716-0.754),为 CVD 的 0.695(95%CI:0.687-0.703)。种族/民族的亚组分析显示出相似的结果。腰围(WC)、BMI、锥度指数、体圆度指数(BRI)、Clinica Universidad de Navarra-Body Adiposity Estimator(CUN-BAE)、新 BMI 和腰围身高比(WHtR)与肌少症性肥胖呈负相关,而 LBSIZ 和锥度指数与肌少症性肥胖呈正相关。LBSIZ 的 AUC 对于肌少症性肥胖明显高于锥度指数(p<0.001)。LBSIZ 的 AUC 对于 CVD 明显高于包括 WC、BMI、BRI、CUN-BAE、新 BMI 和 WHtR 在内的参数(p<0.001)。单独使用锥度指数的 AUC 与 LBSIZ 用于 CVD 相当。总体而言,LBSIZ 截断值为 0.35,用于肌少症性肥胖(敏感性,65.3%;特异性,71.5%)和 CVD(敏感性,63.3%;特异性,66.6%)。这些结果不仅对于识别肌少症性肥胖有用,而且对于临床环境中的 CVD 风险评估也有用。